Theory DefAss

Up to index of Isabelle/HOL/Jinja

theory DefAss
imports BigStep
(*  Title:      Jinja/DefAss.thy
Author: Tobias Nipkow
Copyright 2003 Technische Universitaet Muenchen
*)


header {* \isaheader{Definite assignment} *}

theory DefAss imports BigStep begin

subsection "Hypersets"

type_synonym 'a hyperset = "'a set option"

definition hyperUn :: "'a hyperset => 'a hyperset => 'a hyperset" (infixl "\<squnion>" 65)
where
"A \<squnion> B ≡ case A of None => None
| ⌊A⌋ => (case B of None => None | ⌊B⌋ => ⌊A ∪ B⌋)"


definition hyperInt :: "'a hyperset => 'a hyperset => 'a hyperset" (infixl "\<sqinter>" 70)
where
"A \<sqinter> B ≡ case A of None => B
| ⌊A⌋ => (case B of None => ⌊A⌋ | ⌊B⌋ => ⌊A ∩ B⌋)"


definition hyperDiff1 :: "'a hyperset => 'a => 'a hyperset" (infixl "\<ominus>" 65)
where
"A \<ominus> a ≡ case A of None => None | ⌊A⌋ => ⌊A - {a}⌋"

definition hyper_isin :: "'a => 'a hyperset => bool" (infix "∈∈" 50)
where
"a ∈∈ A ≡ case A of None => True | ⌊A⌋ => a ∈ A"

definition hyper_subset :: "'a hyperset => 'a hyperset => bool" (infix "\<sqsubseteq>" 50)
where
"A \<sqsubseteq> B ≡ case B of None => True
| ⌊B⌋ => (case A of None => False | ⌊A⌋ => A ⊆ B)"


lemmas hyperset_defs =
hyperUn_def hyperInt_def hyperDiff1_def hyper_isin_def hyper_subset_def

lemma [simp]: "⌊{}⌋ \<squnion> A = A ∧ A \<squnion> ⌊{}⌋ = A"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs)(*>*)

lemma [simp]: "⌊A⌋ \<squnion> ⌊B⌋ = ⌊A ∪ B⌋ ∧ ⌊A⌋ \<ominus> a = ⌊A - {a}⌋"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs)(*>*)

lemma [simp]: "None \<squnion> A = None ∧ A \<squnion> None = None"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs)(*>*)

lemma [simp]: "a ∈∈ None ∧ None \<ominus> a = None"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs)(*>*)

lemma hyperUn_assoc: "(A \<squnion> B) \<squnion> C = A \<squnion> (B \<squnion> C)"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs Un_assoc)(*>*)

lemma hyper_insert_comm: "A \<squnion> ⌊{a}⌋ = ⌊{a}⌋ \<squnion> A ∧ A \<squnion> (⌊{a}⌋ \<squnion> B) = ⌊{a}⌋ \<squnion> (A \<squnion> B)"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs)(*>*)


subsection "Definite assignment"

primrec
\<A> :: "'a exp => 'a hyperset"
and \<A>s :: "'a exp list => 'a hyperset"
where
"\<A> (new C) = ⌊{}⌋"
| "\<A> (Cast C e) = \<A> e"
| "\<A> (Val v) = ⌊{}⌋"
| "\<A> (e1 «bop» e2) = \<A> e1 \<squnion> \<A> e2"
| "\<A> (Var V) = ⌊{}⌋"
| "\<A> (LAss V e) = ⌊{V}⌋ \<squnion> \<A> e"
| "\<A> (e•F{D}) = \<A> e"
| "\<A> (e1•F{D}:=e2) = \<A> e1 \<squnion> \<A> e2"
| "\<A> (e•M(es)) = \<A> e \<squnion> \<A>s es"
| "\<A> ({V:T; e}) = \<A> e \<ominus> V"
| "\<A> (e1;;e2) = \<A> e1 \<squnion> \<A> e2"
| "\<A> (if (e) e1 else e2) = \<A> e \<squnion> (\<A> e1 \<sqinter> \<A> e2)"
| "\<A> (while (b) e) = \<A> b"
| "\<A> (throw e) = None"
| "\<A> (try e1 catch(C V) e2) = \<A> e1 \<sqinter> (\<A> e2 \<ominus> V)"

| "\<A>s ([]) = ⌊{}⌋"
| "\<A>s (e#es) = \<A> e \<squnion> \<A>s es"

primrec
\<D> :: "'a exp => 'a hyperset => bool"
and \<D>s :: "'a exp list => 'a hyperset => bool"
where
"\<D> (new C) A = True"
| "\<D> (Cast C e) A = \<D> e A"
| "\<D> (Val v) A = True"
| "\<D> (e1 «bop» e2) A = (\<D> e1 A ∧ \<D> e2 (A \<squnion> \<A> e1))"
| "\<D> (Var V) A = (V ∈∈ A)"
| "\<D> (LAss V e) A = \<D> e A"
| "\<D> (e•F{D}) A = \<D> e A"
| "\<D> (e1•F{D}:=e2) A = (\<D> e1 A ∧ \<D> e2 (A \<squnion> \<A> e1))"
| "\<D> (e•M(es)) A = (\<D> e A ∧ \<D>s es (A \<squnion> \<A> e))"
| "\<D> ({V:T; e}) A = \<D> e (A \<ominus> V)"
| "\<D> (e1;;e2) A = (\<D> e1 A ∧ \<D> e2 (A \<squnion> \<A> e1))"
| "\<D> (if (e) e1 else e2) A =
(\<D> e A ∧ \<D> e1 (A \<squnion> \<A> e) ∧ \<D> e2 (A \<squnion> \<A> e))"

| "\<D> (while (e) c) A = (\<D> e A ∧ \<D> c (A \<squnion> \<A> e))"
| "\<D> (throw e) A = \<D> e A"
| "\<D> (try e1 catch(C V) e2) A = (\<D> e1 A ∧ \<D> e2 (A \<squnion> ⌊{V}⌋))"

| "\<D>s ([]) A = True"
| "\<D>s (e#es) A = (\<D> e A ∧ \<D>s es (A \<squnion> \<A> e))"

lemma As_map_Val[simp]: "\<A>s (map Val vs) = ⌊{}⌋"
(*<*)by (induct vs) simp_all(*>*)

lemma D_append[iff]: "!!A. \<D>s (es @ es') A = (\<D>s es A ∧ \<D>s es' (A \<squnion> \<A>s es))"
(*<*)by (induct es type:list) (auto simp:hyperUn_assoc)(*>*)


lemma A_fv: "!!A. \<A> e = ⌊A⌋ ==> A ⊆ fv e"
and "!!A. \<A>s es = ⌊A⌋ ==> A ⊆ fvs es"
(*<*)
apply(induct e and es)
apply (simp_all add:hyperset_defs)
apply blast+
done
(*>*)


lemma sqUn_lem: "A \<sqsubseteq> A' ==> A \<squnion> B \<sqsubseteq> A' \<squnion> B"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs) blast(*>*)

lemma diff_lem: "A \<sqsubseteq> A' ==> A \<ominus> b \<sqsubseteq> A' \<ominus> b"
(*<*)by(simp add:hyperset_defs) blast(*>*)

(* This order of the premises avoids looping of the simplifier *)
lemma D_mono: "!!A A'. A \<sqsubseteq> A' ==> \<D> e A ==> \<D> (e::'a exp) A'"
and Ds_mono: "!!A A'. A \<sqsubseteq> A' ==> \<D>s es A ==> \<D>s (es::'a exp list) A'"
(*<*)
apply(induct e and es)
apply simp
apply simp
apply simp
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
apply (fastforce simp add:hyperset_defs)
apply simp
apply simp
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
apply simp apply (iprover dest:diff_lem)
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
apply simp
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
apply simp
apply simp apply (iprover dest:sqUn_lem)
done
(*>*)

(* And this is the order of premises preferred during application: *)
lemma D_mono': "\<D> e A ==> A \<sqsubseteq> A' ==> \<D> e A'"
and Ds_mono': "\<D>s es A ==> A \<sqsubseteq> A' ==> \<D>s es A'"
(*<*)by(blast intro:D_mono, blast intro:Ds_mono)(*>*)

(*
text{* @{term"\<A>"} is sound w.r.t.\ the big step semantics: it
computes a conservative approximation of the variables actually
assigned to. *}

lemma "P \<turnstile> ⟨e,(h0,l0)⟩ => ⟨e',(h1,l1)⟩ ==> (!!A. \<A> e = ⌊A⌋ ==> A ⊆ dom l1)"
and "P \<turnstile> ⟨es,(h0,l0)⟩ [=>] ⟨es',(h1,l1)⟩ ==> (!!A. \<A>s es = ⌊A⌋ ==> A ⊆ dom l1)"

proof (induct rule:eval_evals_induct)
case LAss thus ?case apply(simp add:dom_def hyperset_defs) apply blast
apply blast
next
case FAss thus ?case by simp (blast dest:eval_lcl_incr)
next
case BinOp thus ?case by simp (blast dest:eval_lcl_incr)
next
case Call thus ?case by simp (blast dest:evals_lcl_incr)
next
case Cons thus ?case by simp (blast dest:evals_lcl_incr)
next
case Block thus ?case by(simp del: fun_upd_apply) blast
next
case Seq thus ?case by simp (blast dest:eval_lcl_incr)
next
case CondT thus ?case by simp (blast dest:eval_lcl_incr)
next
case CondF thus ?case by simp (blast dest:eval_lcl_incr)
next
case Try thus ?case by(fastforce dest!: eval_lcl_incr)
next
case TryCatch thus ?case by(fastforce dest!: eval_lcl_incr)
qed auto
*)

end