header {* Implementation of Red-Black Trees *}
theory RBT_Impl
imports Main
begin
text {*
For applications, you should use theory @{text RBT} which defines
an abstract type of red-black tree obeying the invariant.
*}
subsection {* Datatype of RB trees *}
datatype color = R | B
datatype ('a, 'b) rbt = Empty | Branch color "('a, 'b) rbt" 'a 'b "('a, 'b) rbt"
lemma rbt_cases:
obtains (Empty) "t = Empty"
| (Red) l k v r where "t = Branch R l k v r"
| (Black) l k v r where "t = Branch B l k v r"
proof (cases t)
case Empty with that show thesis by blast
next
case (Branch c) with that show thesis by (cases c) blast+
qed
subsection {* Tree properties *}
subsubsection {* Content of a tree *}
primrec entries :: "('a, 'b) rbt => ('a × 'b) list"
where
"entries Empty = []"
| "entries (Branch _ l k v r) = entries l @ (k,v) # entries r"
abbreviation (input) entry_in_tree :: "'a => 'b => ('a, 'b) rbt => bool"
where
"entry_in_tree k v t ≡ (k, v) ∈ set (entries t)"
definition keys :: "('a, 'b) rbt => 'a list" where
"keys t = map fst (entries t)"
lemma keys_simps [simp, code]:
"keys Empty = []"
"keys (Branch c l k v r) = keys l @ k # keys r"
by (simp_all add: keys_def)
lemma entry_in_tree_keys:
assumes "(k, v) ∈ set (entries t)"
shows "k ∈ set (keys t)"
proof -
from assms have "fst (k, v) ∈ fst ` set (entries t)" by (rule imageI)
then show ?thesis by (simp add: keys_def)
qed
lemma keys_entries:
"k ∈ set (keys t) <-> (∃v. (k, v) ∈ set (entries t))"
by (auto intro: entry_in_tree_keys) (auto simp add: keys_def)
lemma non_empty_rbt_keys:
"t ≠ rbt.Empty ==> keys t ≠ []"
by (cases t) simp_all
subsubsection {* Search tree properties *}
context ord begin
definition rbt_less :: "'a => ('a, 'b) rbt => bool"
where
rbt_less_prop: "rbt_less k t <-> (∀x∈set (keys t). x < k)"
abbreviation rbt_less_symbol (infix "|«" 50)
where "t |« x ≡ rbt_less x t"
definition rbt_greater :: "'a => ('a, 'b) rbt => bool" (infix "«|" 50)
where
rbt_greater_prop: "rbt_greater k t = (∀x∈set (keys t). k < x)"
lemma rbt_less_simps [simp]:
"Empty |« k = True"
"Branch c lt kt v rt |« k <-> kt < k ∧ lt |« k ∧ rt |« k"
by (auto simp add: rbt_less_prop)
lemma rbt_greater_simps [simp]:
"k «| Empty = True"
"k «| (Branch c lt kt v rt) <-> k < kt ∧ k «| lt ∧ k «| rt"
by (auto simp add: rbt_greater_prop)
lemmas rbt_ord_props = rbt_less_prop rbt_greater_prop
lemmas rbt_greater_nit = rbt_greater_prop entry_in_tree_keys
lemmas rbt_less_nit = rbt_less_prop entry_in_tree_keys
lemma (in order)
shows rbt_less_eq_trans: "l |« u ==> u ≤ v ==> l |« v"
and rbt_less_trans: "t |« x ==> x < y ==> t |« y"
and rbt_greater_eq_trans: "u ≤ v ==> v «| r ==> u «| r"
and rbt_greater_trans: "x < y ==> y «| t ==> x «| t"
by (auto simp: rbt_ord_props)
primrec rbt_sorted :: "('a, 'b) rbt => bool"
where
"rbt_sorted Empty = True"
| "rbt_sorted (Branch c l k v r) = (l |« k ∧ k «| r ∧ rbt_sorted l ∧ rbt_sorted r)"
end
context linorder begin
lemma rbt_sorted_entries:
"rbt_sorted t ==> List.sorted (map fst (entries t))"
by (induct t)
(force simp: sorted_append sorted_Cons rbt_ord_props
dest!: entry_in_tree_keys)+
lemma distinct_entries:
"rbt_sorted t ==> distinct (map fst (entries t))"
by (induct t)
(force simp: sorted_append sorted_Cons rbt_ord_props
dest!: entry_in_tree_keys)+
lemma distinct_keys:
"rbt_sorted t ==> distinct (keys t)"
by (simp add: distinct_entries keys_def)
subsubsection {* Tree lookup *}
primrec (in ord) rbt_lookup :: "('a, 'b) rbt => 'a \<rightharpoonup> 'b"
where
"rbt_lookup Empty k = None"
| "rbt_lookup (Branch _ l x y r) k =
(if k < x then rbt_lookup l k else if x < k then rbt_lookup r k else Some y)"
lemma rbt_lookup_keys: "rbt_sorted t ==> dom (rbt_lookup t) = set (keys t)"
by (induct t) (auto simp: dom_def rbt_greater_prop rbt_less_prop)
lemma dom_rbt_lookup_Branch:
"rbt_sorted (Branch c t1 k v t2) ==>
dom (rbt_lookup (Branch c t1 k v t2))
= Set.insert k (dom (rbt_lookup t1) ∪ dom (rbt_lookup t2))"
proof -
assume "rbt_sorted (Branch c t1 k v t2)"
moreover from this have "rbt_sorted t1" "rbt_sorted t2" by simp_all
ultimately show ?thesis by (simp add: rbt_lookup_keys)
qed
lemma finite_dom_rbt_lookup [simp, intro!]: "finite (dom (rbt_lookup t))"
proof (induct t)
case Empty then show ?case by simp
next
case (Branch color t1 a b t2)
let ?A = "Set.insert a (dom (rbt_lookup t1) ∪ dom (rbt_lookup t2))"
have "dom (rbt_lookup (Branch color t1 a b t2)) ⊆ ?A" by (auto split: split_if_asm)
moreover from Branch have "finite (insert a (dom (rbt_lookup t1) ∪ dom (rbt_lookup t2)))" by simp
ultimately show ?case by (rule finite_subset)
qed
end
context ord begin
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_less[simp]: "t |« k ==> rbt_lookup t k = None"
by (induct t) auto
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_greater[simp]: "k «| t ==> rbt_lookup t k = None"
by (induct t) auto
lemma rbt_lookup_Empty: "rbt_lookup Empty = empty"
by (rule ext) simp
end
context linorder begin
lemma map_of_entries:
"rbt_sorted t ==> map_of (entries t) = rbt_lookup t"
proof (induct t)
case Empty thus ?case by (simp add: rbt_lookup_Empty)
next
case (Branch c t1 k v t2)
have "rbt_lookup (Branch c t1 k v t2) = rbt_lookup t2 ++ [k\<mapsto>v] ++ rbt_lookup t1"
proof (rule ext)
fix x
from Branch have RBT_SORTED: "rbt_sorted (Branch c t1 k v t2)" by simp
let ?thesis = "rbt_lookup (Branch c t1 k v t2) x = (rbt_lookup t2 ++ [k \<mapsto> v] ++ rbt_lookup t1) x"
have DOM_T1: "!!k'. k'∈dom (rbt_lookup t1) ==> k>k'"
proof -
fix k'
from RBT_SORTED have "t1 |« k" by simp
with rbt_less_prop have "∀k'∈set (keys t1). k>k'" by auto
moreover assume "k'∈dom (rbt_lookup t1)"
ultimately show "k>k'" using rbt_lookup_keys RBT_SORTED by auto
qed
have DOM_T2: "!!k'. k'∈dom (rbt_lookup t2) ==> k<k'"
proof -
fix k'
from RBT_SORTED have "k «| t2" by simp
with rbt_greater_prop have "∀k'∈set (keys t2). k<k'" by auto
moreover assume "k'∈dom (rbt_lookup t2)"
ultimately show "k<k'" using rbt_lookup_keys RBT_SORTED by auto
qed
{
assume C: "x<k"
hence "rbt_lookup (Branch c t1 k v t2) x = rbt_lookup t1 x" by simp
moreover from C have "x∉dom [k\<mapsto>v]" by simp
moreover have "x ∉ dom (rbt_lookup t2)"
proof
assume "x ∈ dom (rbt_lookup t2)"
with DOM_T2 have "k<x" by blast
with C show False by simp
qed
ultimately have ?thesis by (simp add: map_add_upd_left map_add_dom_app_simps)
} moreover {
assume [simp]: "x=k"
hence "rbt_lookup (Branch c t1 k v t2) x = [k \<mapsto> v] x" by simp
moreover have "x ∉ dom (rbt_lookup t1)"
proof
assume "x ∈ dom (rbt_lookup t1)"
with DOM_T1 have "k>x" by blast
thus False by simp
qed
ultimately have ?thesis by (simp add: map_add_upd_left map_add_dom_app_simps)
} moreover {
assume C: "x>k"
hence "rbt_lookup (Branch c t1 k v t2) x = rbt_lookup t2 x" by (simp add: less_not_sym[of k x])
moreover from C have "x∉dom [k\<mapsto>v]" by simp
moreover have "x∉dom (rbt_lookup t1)" proof
assume "x∈dom (rbt_lookup t1)"
with DOM_T1 have "k>x" by simp
with C show False by simp
qed
ultimately have ?thesis by (simp add: map_add_upd_left map_add_dom_app_simps)
} ultimately show ?thesis using less_linear by blast
qed
also from Branch
have "rbt_lookup t2 ++ [k \<mapsto> v] ++ rbt_lookup t1 = map_of (entries (Branch c t1 k v t2))" by simp
finally show ?case by simp
qed
lemma rbt_lookup_in_tree: "rbt_sorted t ==> rbt_lookup t k = Some v <-> (k, v) ∈ set (entries t)"
by (simp add: map_of_entries [symmetric] distinct_entries)
lemma set_entries_inject:
assumes rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted t1" "rbt_sorted t2"
shows "set (entries t1) = set (entries t2) <-> entries t1 = entries t2"
proof -
from rbt_sorted have "distinct (map fst (entries t1))"
"distinct (map fst (entries t2))"
by (auto intro: distinct_entries)
with rbt_sorted show ?thesis
by (auto intro: map_sorted_distinct_set_unique rbt_sorted_entries simp add: distinct_map)
qed
lemma entries_eqI:
assumes rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted t1" "rbt_sorted t2"
assumes rbt_lookup: "rbt_lookup t1 = rbt_lookup t2"
shows "entries t1 = entries t2"
proof -
from rbt_sorted rbt_lookup have "map_of (entries t1) = map_of (entries t2)"
by (simp add: map_of_entries)
with rbt_sorted have "set (entries t1) = set (entries t2)"
by (simp add: map_of_inject_set distinct_entries)
with rbt_sorted show ?thesis by (simp add: set_entries_inject)
qed
lemma entries_rbt_lookup:
assumes "rbt_sorted t1" "rbt_sorted t2"
shows "entries t1 = entries t2 <-> rbt_lookup t1 = rbt_lookup t2"
using assms by (auto intro: entries_eqI simp add: map_of_entries [symmetric])
lemma rbt_lookup_from_in_tree:
assumes "rbt_sorted t1" "rbt_sorted t2"
and "!!v. (k, v) ∈ set (entries t1) <-> (k, v) ∈ set (entries t2)"
shows "rbt_lookup t1 k = rbt_lookup t2 k"
proof -
from assms have "k ∈ dom (rbt_lookup t1) <-> k ∈ dom (rbt_lookup t2)"
by (simp add: keys_entries rbt_lookup_keys)
with assms show ?thesis by (auto simp add: rbt_lookup_in_tree [symmetric])
qed
end
subsubsection {* Red-black properties *}
primrec color_of :: "('a, 'b) rbt => color"
where
"color_of Empty = B"
| "color_of (Branch c _ _ _ _) = c"
primrec bheight :: "('a,'b) rbt => nat"
where
"bheight Empty = 0"
| "bheight (Branch c lt k v rt) = (if c = B then Suc (bheight lt) else bheight lt)"
primrec inv1 :: "('a, 'b) rbt => bool"
where
"inv1 Empty = True"
| "inv1 (Branch c lt k v rt) <-> inv1 lt ∧ inv1 rt ∧ (c = B ∨ color_of lt = B ∧ color_of rt = B)"
primrec inv1l :: "('a, 'b) rbt => bool" -- {* Weaker version *}
where
"inv1l Empty = True"
| "inv1l (Branch c l k v r) = (inv1 l ∧ inv1 r)"
lemma [simp]: "inv1 t ==> inv1l t" by (cases t) simp+
primrec inv2 :: "('a, 'b) rbt => bool"
where
"inv2 Empty = True"
| "inv2 (Branch c lt k v rt) = (inv2 lt ∧ inv2 rt ∧ bheight lt = bheight rt)"
context ord begin
definition is_rbt :: "('a, 'b) rbt => bool" where
"is_rbt t <-> inv1 t ∧ inv2 t ∧ color_of t = B ∧ rbt_sorted t"
lemma is_rbt_rbt_sorted [simp]:
"is_rbt t ==> rbt_sorted t" by (simp add: is_rbt_def)
theorem Empty_is_rbt [simp]:
"is_rbt Empty" by (simp add: is_rbt_def)
end
subsection {* Insertion *}
fun
balance :: "('a,'b) rbt => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where
"balance (Branch R a w x b) s t (Branch R c y z d) = Branch R (Branch B a w x b) s t (Branch B c y z d)" |
"balance (Branch R (Branch R a w x b) s t c) y z d = Branch R (Branch B a w x b) s t (Branch B c y z d)" |
"balance (Branch R a w x (Branch R b s t c)) y z d = Branch R (Branch B a w x b) s t (Branch B c y z d)" |
"balance a w x (Branch R b s t (Branch R c y z d)) = Branch R (Branch B a w x b) s t (Branch B c y z d)" |
"balance a w x (Branch R (Branch R b s t c) y z d) = Branch R (Branch B a w x b) s t (Branch B c y z d)" |
"balance a s t b = Branch B a s t b"
lemma balance_inv1: "[|inv1l l; inv1l r|] ==> inv1 (balance l k v r)"
by (induct l k v r rule: balance.induct) auto
lemma balance_bheight: "bheight l = bheight r ==> bheight (balance l k v r) = Suc (bheight l)"
by (induct l k v r rule: balance.induct) auto
lemma balance_inv2:
assumes "inv2 l" "inv2 r" "bheight l = bheight r"
shows "inv2 (balance l k v r)"
using assms
by (induct l k v r rule: balance.induct) auto
context ord begin
lemma balance_rbt_greater[simp]: "(v «| balance a k x b) = (v «| a ∧ v «| b ∧ v < k)"
by (induct a k x b rule: balance.induct) auto
lemma balance_rbt_less[simp]: "(balance a k x b |« v) = (a |« v ∧ b |« v ∧ k < v)"
by (induct a k x b rule: balance.induct) auto
end
lemma (in linorder) balance_rbt_sorted:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "rbt_sorted l" "rbt_sorted r" "l |« k" "k «| r"
shows "rbt_sorted (balance l k v r)"
using assms proof (induct l k v r rule: balance.induct)
case ("2_2" a x w b y t c z s va vb vd vc)
hence "y < z ∧ z «| Branch B va vb vd vc"
by (auto simp add: rbt_ord_props)
hence "y «| (Branch B va vb vd vc)" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with "2_2" show ?case by simp
next
case ("3_2" va vb vd vc x w b y s c z)
from "3_2" have "x < y ∧ Branch B va vb vd vc |« x"
by simp
hence "Branch B va vb vd vc |« y" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with "3_2" show ?case by simp
next
case ("3_3" x w b y s c z t va vb vd vc)
from "3_3" have "y < z ∧ z «| Branch B va vb vd vc" by simp
hence "y «| Branch B va vb vd vc" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with "3_3" show ?case by simp
next
case ("3_4" vd ve vg vf x w b y s c z t va vb vii vc)
hence "x < y ∧ Branch B vd ve vg vf |« x" by simp
hence 1: "Branch B vd ve vg vf |« y" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
from "3_4" have "y < z ∧ z «| Branch B va vb vii vc" by simp
hence "y «| Branch B va vb vii vc" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with 1 "3_4" show ?case by simp
next
case ("4_2" va vb vd vc x w b y s c z t dd)
hence "x < y ∧ Branch B va vb vd vc |« x" by simp
hence "Branch B va vb vd vc |« y" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with "4_2" show ?case by simp
next
case ("5_2" x w b y s c z t va vb vd vc)
hence "y < z ∧ z «| Branch B va vb vd vc" by simp
hence "y «| Branch B va vb vd vc" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with "5_2" show ?case by simp
next
case ("5_3" va vb vd vc x w b y s c z t)
hence "x < y ∧ Branch B va vb vd vc |« x" by simp
hence "Branch B va vb vd vc |« y" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with "5_3" show ?case by simp
next
case ("5_4" va vb vg vc x w b y s c z t vd ve vii vf)
hence "x < y ∧ Branch B va vb vg vc |« x" by simp
hence 1: "Branch B va vb vg vc |« y" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
from "5_4" have "y < z ∧ z «| Branch B vd ve vii vf" by simp
hence "y «| Branch B vd ve vii vf" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with 1 "5_4" show ?case by simp
qed simp+
lemma entries_balance [simp]:
"entries (balance l k v r) = entries l @ (k, v) # entries r"
by (induct l k v r rule: balance.induct) auto
lemma keys_balance [simp]:
"keys (balance l k v r) = keys l @ k # keys r"
by (simp add: keys_def)
lemma balance_in_tree:
"entry_in_tree k x (balance l v y r) <-> entry_in_tree k x l ∨ k = v ∧ x = y ∨ entry_in_tree k x r"
by (auto simp add: keys_def)
lemma (in linorder) rbt_lookup_balance[simp]:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "rbt_sorted l" "rbt_sorted r" "l |« k" "k «| r"
shows "rbt_lookup (balance l k v r) x = rbt_lookup (Branch B l k v r) x"
by (rule rbt_lookup_from_in_tree) (auto simp:assms balance_in_tree balance_rbt_sorted)
primrec paint :: "color => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where
"paint c Empty = Empty"
| "paint c (Branch _ l k v r) = Branch c l k v r"
lemma paint_inv1l[simp]: "inv1l t ==> inv1l (paint c t)" by (cases t) auto
lemma paint_inv1[simp]: "inv1l t ==> inv1 (paint B t)" by (cases t) auto
lemma paint_inv2[simp]: "inv2 t ==> inv2 (paint c t)" by (cases t) auto
lemma paint_color_of[simp]: "color_of (paint B t) = B" by (cases t) auto
lemma paint_in_tree[simp]: "entry_in_tree k x (paint c t) = entry_in_tree k x t" by (cases t) auto
context ord begin
lemma paint_rbt_sorted[simp]: "rbt_sorted t ==> rbt_sorted (paint c t)" by (cases t) auto
lemma paint_rbt_lookup[simp]: "rbt_lookup (paint c t) = rbt_lookup t" by (rule ext) (cases t, auto)
lemma paint_rbt_greater[simp]: "(v «| paint c t) = (v «| t)" by (cases t) auto
lemma paint_rbt_less[simp]: "(paint c t |« v) = (t |« v)" by (cases t) auto
fun
rbt_ins :: "('a => 'b => 'b => 'b) => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where
"rbt_ins f k v Empty = Branch R Empty k v Empty" |
"rbt_ins f k v (Branch B l x y r) = (if k < x then balance (rbt_ins f k v l) x y r
else if k > x then balance l x y (rbt_ins f k v r)
else Branch B l x (f k y v) r)" |
"rbt_ins f k v (Branch R l x y r) = (if k < x then Branch R (rbt_ins f k v l) x y r
else if k > x then Branch R l x y (rbt_ins f k v r)
else Branch R l x (f k y v) r)"
lemma ins_inv1_inv2:
assumes "inv1 t" "inv2 t"
shows "inv2 (rbt_ins f k x t)" "bheight (rbt_ins f k x t) = bheight t"
"color_of t = B ==> inv1 (rbt_ins f k x t)" "inv1l (rbt_ins f k x t)"
using assms
by (induct f k x t rule: rbt_ins.induct) (auto simp: balance_inv1 balance_inv2 balance_bheight)
end
context linorder begin
lemma ins_rbt_greater[simp]: "(v «| rbt_ins f (k :: 'a) x t) = (v «| t ∧ k > v)"
by (induct f k x t rule: rbt_ins.induct) auto
lemma ins_rbt_less[simp]: "(rbt_ins f k x t |« v) = (t |« v ∧ k < v)"
by (induct f k x t rule: rbt_ins.induct) auto
lemma ins_rbt_sorted[simp]: "rbt_sorted t ==> rbt_sorted (rbt_ins f k x t)"
by (induct f k x t rule: rbt_ins.induct) (auto simp: balance_rbt_sorted)
lemma keys_ins: "set (keys (rbt_ins f k v t)) = { k } ∪ set (keys t)"
by (induct f k v t rule: rbt_ins.induct) auto
lemma rbt_lookup_ins:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "rbt_sorted t"
shows "rbt_lookup (rbt_ins f k v t) x = ((rbt_lookup t)(k |-> case rbt_lookup t k of None => v
| Some w => f k w v)) x"
using assms by (induct f k v t rule: rbt_ins.induct) auto
end
context ord begin
definition rbt_insert_with_key :: "('a => 'b => 'b => 'b) => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where "rbt_insert_with_key f k v t = paint B (rbt_ins f k v t)"
definition rbt_insertw_def: "rbt_insert_with f = rbt_insert_with_key (λ_. f)"
definition rbt_insert :: "'a => 'b => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt" where
"rbt_insert = rbt_insert_with_key (λ_ _ nv. nv)"
end
context linorder begin
lemma rbt_insertwk_rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted t ==> rbt_sorted (rbt_insert_with_key f (k :: 'a) x t)"
by (auto simp: rbt_insert_with_key_def)
theorem rbt_insertwk_is_rbt:
assumes inv: "is_rbt t"
shows "is_rbt (rbt_insert_with_key f k x t)"
using assms
unfolding rbt_insert_with_key_def is_rbt_def
by (auto simp: ins_inv1_inv2)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_insertwk:
assumes "rbt_sorted t"
shows "rbt_lookup (rbt_insert_with_key f k v t) x = ((rbt_lookup t)(k |-> case rbt_lookup t k of None => v
| Some w => f k w v)) x"
unfolding rbt_insert_with_key_def using assms
by (simp add:rbt_lookup_ins)
lemma rbt_insertw_rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted t ==> rbt_sorted (rbt_insert_with f k v t)"
by (simp add: rbt_insertwk_rbt_sorted rbt_insertw_def)
theorem rbt_insertw_is_rbt: "is_rbt t ==> is_rbt (rbt_insert_with f k v t)"
by (simp add: rbt_insertwk_is_rbt rbt_insertw_def)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_insertw:
assumes "is_rbt t"
shows "rbt_lookup (rbt_insert_with f k v t) = (rbt_lookup t)(k \<mapsto> (if k:dom (rbt_lookup t) then f (the (rbt_lookup t k)) v else v))"
using assms
unfolding rbt_insertw_def
by (rule_tac ext) (cases "rbt_lookup t k", auto simp:rbt_lookup_rbt_insertwk dom_def)
lemma rbt_insert_rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted t ==> rbt_sorted (rbt_insert k v t)"
by (simp add: rbt_insertwk_rbt_sorted rbt_insert_def)
theorem rbt_insert_is_rbt [simp]: "is_rbt t ==> is_rbt (rbt_insert k v t)"
by (simp add: rbt_insertwk_is_rbt rbt_insert_def)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_insert:
assumes "is_rbt t"
shows "rbt_lookup (rbt_insert k v t) = (rbt_lookup t)(k\<mapsto>v)"
unfolding rbt_insert_def
using assms
by (rule_tac ext) (simp add: rbt_lookup_rbt_insertwk split:option.split)
end
subsection {* Deletion *}
lemma bheight_paintR'[simp]: "color_of t = B ==> bheight (paint R t) = bheight t - 1"
by (cases t rule: rbt_cases) auto
fun
balance_left :: "('a,'b) rbt => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where
"balance_left (Branch R a k x b) s y c = Branch R (Branch B a k x b) s y c" |
"balance_left bl k x (Branch B a s y b) = balance bl k x (Branch R a s y b)" |
"balance_left bl k x (Branch R (Branch B a s y b) t z c) = Branch R (Branch B bl k x a) s y (balance b t z (paint R c))" |
"balance_left t k x s = Empty"
lemma balance_left_inv2_with_inv1:
assumes "inv2 lt" "inv2 rt" "bheight lt + 1 = bheight rt" "inv1 rt"
shows "bheight (balance_left lt k v rt) = bheight lt + 1"
and "inv2 (balance_left lt k v rt)"
using assms
by (induct lt k v rt rule: balance_left.induct) (auto simp: balance_inv2 balance_bheight)
lemma balance_left_inv2_app:
assumes "inv2 lt" "inv2 rt" "bheight lt + 1 = bheight rt" "color_of rt = B"
shows "inv2 (balance_left lt k v rt)"
"bheight (balance_left lt k v rt) = bheight rt"
using assms
by (induct lt k v rt rule: balance_left.induct) (auto simp add: balance_inv2 balance_bheight)+
lemma balance_left_inv1: "[|inv1l a; inv1 b; color_of b = B|] ==> inv1 (balance_left a k x b)"
by (induct a k x b rule: balance_left.induct) (simp add: balance_inv1)+
lemma balance_left_inv1l: "[| inv1l lt; inv1 rt |] ==> inv1l (balance_left lt k x rt)"
by (induct lt k x rt rule: balance_left.induct) (auto simp: balance_inv1)
lemma (in linorder) balance_left_rbt_sorted:
"[| rbt_sorted l; rbt_sorted r; rbt_less k l; k «| r |] ==> rbt_sorted (balance_left l k v r)"
apply (induct l k v r rule: balance_left.induct)
apply (auto simp: balance_rbt_sorted)
apply (unfold rbt_greater_prop rbt_less_prop)
by force+
context order begin
lemma balance_left_rbt_greater:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "k «| a" "k «| b" "k < x"
shows "k «| balance_left a x t b"
using assms
by (induct a x t b rule: balance_left.induct) auto
lemma balance_left_rbt_less:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "a |« k" "b |« k" "x < k"
shows "balance_left a x t b |« k"
using assms
by (induct a x t b rule: balance_left.induct) auto
end
lemma balance_left_in_tree:
assumes "inv1l l" "inv1 r" "bheight l + 1 = bheight r"
shows "entry_in_tree k v (balance_left l a b r) = (entry_in_tree k v l ∨ k = a ∧ v = b ∨ entry_in_tree k v r)"
using assms
by (induct l k v r rule: balance_left.induct) (auto simp: balance_in_tree)
fun
balance_right :: "('a,'b) rbt => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where
"balance_right a k x (Branch R b s y c) = Branch R a k x (Branch B b s y c)" |
"balance_right (Branch B a k x b) s y bl = balance (Branch R a k x b) s y bl" |
"balance_right (Branch R a k x (Branch B b s y c)) t z bl = Branch R (balance (paint R a) k x b) s y (Branch B c t z bl)" |
"balance_right t k x s = Empty"
lemma balance_right_inv2_with_inv1:
assumes "inv2 lt" "inv2 rt" "bheight lt = bheight rt + 1" "inv1 lt"
shows "inv2 (balance_right lt k v rt) ∧ bheight (balance_right lt k v rt) = bheight lt"
using assms
by (induct lt k v rt rule: balance_right.induct) (auto simp: balance_inv2 balance_bheight)
lemma balance_right_inv1: "[|inv1 a; inv1l b; color_of a = B|] ==> inv1 (balance_right a k x b)"
by (induct a k x b rule: balance_right.induct) (simp add: balance_inv1)+
lemma balance_right_inv1l: "[| inv1 lt; inv1l rt |] ==>inv1l (balance_right lt k x rt)"
by (induct lt k x rt rule: balance_right.induct) (auto simp: balance_inv1)
lemma (in linorder) balance_right_rbt_sorted:
"[| rbt_sorted l; rbt_sorted r; rbt_less k l; k «| r |] ==> rbt_sorted (balance_right l k v r)"
apply (induct l k v r rule: balance_right.induct)
apply (auto simp:balance_rbt_sorted)
apply (unfold rbt_less_prop rbt_greater_prop)
by force+
context order begin
lemma balance_right_rbt_greater:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "k «| a" "k «| b" "k < x"
shows "k «| balance_right a x t b"
using assms by (induct a x t b rule: balance_right.induct) auto
lemma balance_right_rbt_less:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "a |« k" "b |« k" "x < k"
shows "balance_right a x t b |« k"
using assms by (induct a x t b rule: balance_right.induct) auto
end
lemma balance_right_in_tree:
assumes "inv1 l" "inv1l r" "bheight l = bheight r + 1" "inv2 l" "inv2 r"
shows "entry_in_tree x y (balance_right l k v r) = (entry_in_tree x y l ∨ x = k ∧ y = v ∨ entry_in_tree x y r)"
using assms by (induct l k v r rule: balance_right.induct) (auto simp: balance_in_tree)
fun
combine :: "('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where
"combine Empty x = x"
| "combine x Empty = x"
| "combine (Branch R a k x b) (Branch R c s y d) = (case (combine b c) of
Branch R b2 t z c2 => (Branch R (Branch R a k x b2) t z (Branch R c2 s y d)) |
bc => Branch R a k x (Branch R bc s y d))"
| "combine (Branch B a k x b) (Branch B c s y d) = (case (combine b c) of
Branch R b2 t z c2 => Branch R (Branch B a k x b2) t z (Branch B c2 s y d) |
bc => balance_left a k x (Branch B bc s y d))"
| "combine a (Branch R b k x c) = Branch R (combine a b) k x c"
| "combine (Branch R a k x b) c = Branch R a k x (combine b c)"
lemma combine_inv2:
assumes "inv2 lt" "inv2 rt" "bheight lt = bheight rt"
shows "bheight (combine lt rt) = bheight lt" "inv2 (combine lt rt)"
using assms
by (induct lt rt rule: combine.induct)
(auto simp: balance_left_inv2_app split: rbt.splits color.splits)
lemma combine_inv1:
assumes "inv1 lt" "inv1 rt"
shows "color_of lt = B ==> color_of rt = B ==> inv1 (combine lt rt)"
"inv1l (combine lt rt)"
using assms
by (induct lt rt rule: combine.induct)
(auto simp: balance_left_inv1 split: rbt.splits color.splits)
context linorder begin
lemma combine_rbt_greater[simp]:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "k «| l" "k «| r"
shows "k «| combine l r"
using assms
by (induct l r rule: combine.induct)
(auto simp: balance_left_rbt_greater split:rbt.splits color.splits)
lemma combine_rbt_less[simp]:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "l |« k" "r |« k"
shows "combine l r |« k"
using assms
by (induct l r rule: combine.induct)
(auto simp: balance_left_rbt_less split:rbt.splits color.splits)
lemma combine_rbt_sorted:
fixes k :: "'a"
assumes "rbt_sorted l" "rbt_sorted r" "l |« k" "k «| r"
shows "rbt_sorted (combine l r)"
using assms proof (induct l r rule: combine.induct)
case (3 a x v b c y w d)
hence ineqs: "a |« x" "x «| b" "b |« k" "k «| c" "c |« y" "y «| d"
by auto
with 3
show ?case
by (cases "combine b c" rule: rbt_cases)
(auto, (metis combine_rbt_greater combine_rbt_less ineqs ineqs rbt_less_simps(2) rbt_greater_simps(2) rbt_greater_trans rbt_less_trans)+)
next
case (4 a x v b c y w d)
hence "x < k ∧ rbt_greater k c" by simp
hence "rbt_greater x c" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with 4 have 2: "rbt_greater x (combine b c)" by (simp add: combine_rbt_greater)
from 4 have "k < y ∧ rbt_less k b" by simp
hence "rbt_less y b" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with 4 have 3: "rbt_less y (combine b c)" by (simp add: combine_rbt_less)
show ?case
proof (cases "combine b c" rule: rbt_cases)
case Empty
from 4 have "x < y ∧ rbt_greater y d" by auto
hence "rbt_greater x d" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with 4 Empty have "rbt_sorted a" and "rbt_sorted (Branch B Empty y w d)"
and "rbt_less x a" and "rbt_greater x (Branch B Empty y w d)" by auto
with Empty show ?thesis by (simp add: balance_left_rbt_sorted)
next
case (Red lta va ka rta)
with 2 4 have "x < va ∧ rbt_less x a" by simp
hence 5: "rbt_less va a" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
from Red 3 4 have "va < y ∧ rbt_greater y d" by simp
hence "rbt_greater va d" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with Red 2 3 4 5 show ?thesis by simp
next
case (Black lta va ka rta)
from 4 have "x < y ∧ rbt_greater y d" by auto
hence "rbt_greater x d" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with Black 2 3 4 have "rbt_sorted a" and "rbt_sorted (Branch B (combine b c) y w d)"
and "rbt_less x a" and "rbt_greater x (Branch B (combine b c) y w d)" by auto
with Black show ?thesis by (simp add: balance_left_rbt_sorted)
qed
next
case (5 va vb vd vc b x w c)
hence "k < x ∧ rbt_less k (Branch B va vb vd vc)" by simp
hence "rbt_less x (Branch B va vb vd vc)" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with 5 show ?case by (simp add: combine_rbt_less)
next
case (6 a x v b va vb vd vc)
hence "x < k ∧ rbt_greater k (Branch B va vb vd vc)" by simp
hence "rbt_greater x (Branch B va vb vd vc)" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with 6 show ?case by (simp add: combine_rbt_greater)
qed simp+
end
lemma combine_in_tree:
assumes "inv2 l" "inv2 r" "bheight l = bheight r" "inv1 l" "inv1 r"
shows "entry_in_tree k v (combine l r) = (entry_in_tree k v l ∨ entry_in_tree k v r)"
using assms
proof (induct l r rule: combine.induct)
case (4 _ _ _ b c)
hence a: "bheight (combine b c) = bheight b" by (simp add: combine_inv2)
from 4 have b: "inv1l (combine b c)" by (simp add: combine_inv1)
show ?case
proof (cases "combine b c" rule: rbt_cases)
case Empty
with 4 a show ?thesis by (auto simp: balance_left_in_tree)
next
case (Red lta ka va rta)
with 4 show ?thesis by auto
next
case (Black lta ka va rta)
with a b 4 show ?thesis by (auto simp: balance_left_in_tree)
qed
qed (auto split: rbt.splits color.splits)
context ord begin
fun
rbt_del_from_left :: "'a => ('a,'b) rbt => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt" and
rbt_del_from_right :: "'a => ('a,'b) rbt => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt" and
rbt_del :: "'a=> ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"
where
"rbt_del x Empty = Empty" |
"rbt_del x (Branch c a y s b) =
(if x < y then rbt_del_from_left x a y s b
else (if x > y then rbt_del_from_right x a y s b else combine a b))" |
"rbt_del_from_left x (Branch B lt z v rt) y s b = balance_left (rbt_del x (Branch B lt z v rt)) y s b" |
"rbt_del_from_left x a y s b = Branch R (rbt_del x a) y s b" |
"rbt_del_from_right x a y s (Branch B lt z v rt) = balance_right a y s (rbt_del x (Branch B lt z v rt))" |
"rbt_del_from_right x a y s b = Branch R a y s (rbt_del x b)"
end
context linorder begin
lemma
assumes "inv2 lt" "inv1 lt"
shows
"[|inv2 rt; bheight lt = bheight rt; inv1 rt|] ==>
inv2 (rbt_del_from_left x lt k v rt) ∧
bheight (rbt_del_from_left x lt k v rt) = bheight lt ∧
(color_of lt = B ∧ color_of rt = B ∧ inv1 (rbt_del_from_left x lt k v rt) ∨
(color_of lt ≠ B ∨ color_of rt ≠ B) ∧ inv1l (rbt_del_from_left x lt k v rt))"
and "[|inv2 rt; bheight lt = bheight rt; inv1 rt|] ==>
inv2 (rbt_del_from_right x lt k v rt) ∧
bheight (rbt_del_from_right x lt k v rt) = bheight lt ∧
(color_of lt = B ∧ color_of rt = B ∧ inv1 (rbt_del_from_right x lt k v rt) ∨
(color_of lt ≠ B ∨ color_of rt ≠ B) ∧ inv1l (rbt_del_from_right x lt k v rt))"
and rbt_del_inv1_inv2: "inv2 (rbt_del x lt) ∧ (color_of lt = R ∧ bheight (rbt_del x lt) = bheight lt ∧ inv1 (rbt_del x lt)
∨ color_of lt = B ∧ bheight (rbt_del x lt) = bheight lt - 1 ∧ inv1l (rbt_del x lt))"
using assms
proof (induct x lt k v rt and x lt k v rt and x lt rule: rbt_del_from_left_rbt_del_from_right_rbt_del.induct)
case (2 y c _ y')
have "y = y' ∨ y < y' ∨ y > y'" by auto
thus ?case proof (elim disjE)
assume "y = y'"
with 2 show ?thesis by (cases c) (simp add: combine_inv2 combine_inv1)+
next
assume "y < y'"
with 2 show ?thesis by (cases c) auto
next
assume "y' < y"
with 2 show ?thesis by (cases c) auto
qed
next
case (3 y lt z v rta y' ss bb)
thus ?case by (cases "color_of (Branch B lt z v rta) = B ∧ color_of bb = B") (simp add: balance_left_inv2_with_inv1 balance_left_inv1 balance_left_inv1l)+
next
case (5 y a y' ss lt z v rta)
thus ?case by (cases "color_of a = B ∧ color_of (Branch B lt z v rta) = B") (simp add: balance_right_inv2_with_inv1 balance_right_inv1 balance_right_inv1l)+
next
case ("6_1" y a y' ss) thus ?case by (cases "color_of a = B ∧ color_of Empty = B") simp+
qed auto
lemma
rbt_del_from_left_rbt_less: "[| lt |« v; rt |« v; k < v|] ==> rbt_del_from_left x lt k y rt |« v"
and rbt_del_from_right_rbt_less: "[|lt |« v; rt |« v; k < v|] ==> rbt_del_from_right x lt k y rt |« v"
and rbt_del_rbt_less: "lt |« v ==> rbt_del x lt |« v"
by (induct x lt k y rt and x lt k y rt and x lt rule: rbt_del_from_left_rbt_del_from_right_rbt_del.induct)
(auto simp: balance_left_rbt_less balance_right_rbt_less)
lemma rbt_del_from_left_rbt_greater: "[|v «| lt; v «| rt; k > v|] ==> v «| rbt_del_from_left x lt k y rt"
and rbt_del_from_right_rbt_greater: "[|v «| lt; v «| rt; k > v|] ==> v «| rbt_del_from_right x lt k y rt"
and rbt_del_rbt_greater: "v «| lt ==> v «| rbt_del x lt"
by (induct x lt k y rt and x lt k y rt and x lt rule: rbt_del_from_left_rbt_del_from_right_rbt_del.induct)
(auto simp: balance_left_rbt_greater balance_right_rbt_greater)
lemma "[|rbt_sorted lt; rbt_sorted rt; lt |« k; k «| rt|] ==> rbt_sorted (rbt_del_from_left x lt k y rt)"
and "[|rbt_sorted lt; rbt_sorted rt; lt |« k; k «| rt|] ==> rbt_sorted (rbt_del_from_right x lt k y rt)"
and rbt_del_rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted lt ==> rbt_sorted (rbt_del x lt)"
proof (induct x lt k y rt and x lt k y rt and x lt rule: rbt_del_from_left_rbt_del_from_right_rbt_del.induct)
case (3 x lta zz v rta yy ss bb)
from 3 have "Branch B lta zz v rta |« yy" by simp
hence "rbt_del x (Branch B lta zz v rta) |« yy" by (rule rbt_del_rbt_less)
with 3 show ?case by (simp add: balance_left_rbt_sorted)
next
case ("4_2" x vaa vbb vdd vc yy ss bb)
hence "Branch R vaa vbb vdd vc |« yy" by simp
hence "rbt_del x (Branch R vaa vbb vdd vc) |« yy" by (rule rbt_del_rbt_less)
with "4_2" show ?case by simp
next
case (5 x aa yy ss lta zz v rta)
hence "yy «| Branch B lta zz v rta" by simp
hence "yy «| rbt_del x (Branch B lta zz v rta)" by (rule rbt_del_rbt_greater)
with 5 show ?case by (simp add: balance_right_rbt_sorted)
next
case ("6_2" x aa yy ss vaa vbb vdd vc)
hence "yy «| Branch R vaa vbb vdd vc" by simp
hence "yy «| rbt_del x (Branch R vaa vbb vdd vc)" by (rule rbt_del_rbt_greater)
with "6_2" show ?case by simp
qed (auto simp: combine_rbt_sorted)
lemma "[|rbt_sorted lt; rbt_sorted rt; lt |« kt; kt «| rt; inv1 lt; inv1 rt; inv2 lt; inv2 rt; bheight lt = bheight rt; x < kt|] ==> entry_in_tree k v (rbt_del_from_left x lt kt y rt) = (False ∨ (x ≠ k ∧ entry_in_tree k v (Branch c lt kt y rt)))"
and "[|rbt_sorted lt; rbt_sorted rt; lt |« kt; kt «| rt; inv1 lt; inv1 rt; inv2 lt; inv2 rt; bheight lt = bheight rt; x > kt|] ==> entry_in_tree k v (rbt_del_from_right x lt kt y rt) = (False ∨ (x ≠ k ∧ entry_in_tree k v (Branch c lt kt y rt)))"
and rbt_del_in_tree: "[|rbt_sorted t; inv1 t; inv2 t|] ==> entry_in_tree k v (rbt_del x t) = (False ∨ (x ≠ k ∧ entry_in_tree k v t))"
proof (induct x lt kt y rt and x lt kt y rt and x t rule: rbt_del_from_left_rbt_del_from_right_rbt_del.induct)
case (2 xx c aa yy ss bb)
have "xx = yy ∨ xx < yy ∨ xx > yy" by auto
from this 2 show ?case proof (elim disjE)
assume "xx = yy"
with 2 show ?thesis proof (cases "xx = k")
case True
from 2 `xx = yy` `xx = k` have "rbt_sorted (Branch c aa yy ss bb) ∧ k = yy" by simp
hence "¬ entry_in_tree k v aa" "¬ entry_in_tree k v bb" by (auto simp: rbt_less_nit rbt_greater_prop)
with `xx = yy` 2 `xx = k` show ?thesis by (simp add: combine_in_tree)
qed (simp add: combine_in_tree)
qed simp+
next
case (3 xx lta zz vv rta yy ss bb)
def mt[simp]: mt == "Branch B lta zz vv rta"
from 3 have "inv2 mt ∧ inv1 mt" by simp
hence "inv2 (rbt_del xx mt) ∧ (color_of mt = R ∧ bheight (rbt_del xx mt) = bheight mt ∧ inv1 (rbt_del xx mt) ∨ color_of mt = B ∧ bheight (rbt_del xx mt) = bheight mt - 1 ∧ inv1l (rbt_del xx mt))" by (blast dest: rbt_del_inv1_inv2)
with 3 have 4: "entry_in_tree k v (rbt_del_from_left xx mt yy ss bb) = (False ∨ xx ≠ k ∧ entry_in_tree k v mt ∨ (k = yy ∧ v = ss) ∨ entry_in_tree k v bb)" by (simp add: balance_left_in_tree)
thus ?case proof (cases "xx = k")
case True
from 3 True have "yy «| bb ∧ yy > k" by simp
hence "k «| bb" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with 3 4 True show ?thesis by (auto simp: rbt_greater_nit)
qed auto
next
case ("4_1" xx yy ss bb)
show ?case proof (cases "xx = k")
case True
with "4_1" have "yy «| bb ∧ k < yy" by simp
hence "k «| bb" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with "4_1" `xx = k`
have "entry_in_tree k v (Branch R Empty yy ss bb) = entry_in_tree k v Empty" by (auto simp: rbt_greater_nit)
thus ?thesis by auto
qed simp+
next
case ("4_2" xx vaa vbb vdd vc yy ss bb)
thus ?case proof (cases "xx = k")
case True
with "4_2" have "k < yy ∧ yy «| bb" by simp
hence "k «| bb" by (blast dest: rbt_greater_trans)
with True "4_2" show ?thesis by (auto simp: rbt_greater_nit)
qed auto
next
case (5 xx aa yy ss lta zz vv rta)
def mt[simp]: mt == "Branch B lta zz vv rta"
from 5 have "inv2 mt ∧ inv1 mt" by simp
hence "inv2 (rbt_del xx mt) ∧ (color_of mt = R ∧ bheight (rbt_del xx mt) = bheight mt ∧ inv1 (rbt_del xx mt) ∨ color_of mt = B ∧ bheight (rbt_del xx mt) = bheight mt - 1 ∧ inv1l (rbt_del xx mt))" by (blast dest: rbt_del_inv1_inv2)
with 5 have 3: "entry_in_tree k v (rbt_del_from_right xx aa yy ss mt) = (entry_in_tree k v aa ∨ (k = yy ∧ v = ss) ∨ False ∨ xx ≠ k ∧ entry_in_tree k v mt)" by (simp add: balance_right_in_tree)
thus ?case proof (cases "xx = k")
case True
from 5 True have "aa |« yy ∧ yy < k" by simp
hence "aa |« k" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with 3 5 True show ?thesis by (auto simp: rbt_less_nit)
qed auto
next
case ("6_1" xx aa yy ss)
show ?case proof (cases "xx = k")
case True
with "6_1" have "aa |« yy ∧ k > yy" by simp
hence "aa |« k" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with "6_1" `xx = k` show ?thesis by (auto simp: rbt_less_nit)
qed simp
next
case ("6_2" xx aa yy ss vaa vbb vdd vc)
thus ?case proof (cases "xx = k")
case True
with "6_2" have "k > yy ∧ aa |« yy" by simp
hence "aa |« k" by (blast dest: rbt_less_trans)
with True "6_2" show ?thesis by (auto simp: rbt_less_nit)
qed auto
qed simp
definition (in ord) rbt_delete where
"rbt_delete k t = paint B (rbt_del k t)"
theorem rbt_delete_is_rbt [simp]: assumes "is_rbt t" shows "is_rbt (rbt_delete k t)"
proof -
from assms have "inv2 t" and "inv1 t" unfolding is_rbt_def by auto
hence "inv2 (rbt_del k t) ∧ (color_of t = R ∧ bheight (rbt_del k t) = bheight t ∧ inv1 (rbt_del k t) ∨ color_of t = B ∧ bheight (rbt_del k t) = bheight t - 1 ∧ inv1l (rbt_del k t))" by (rule rbt_del_inv1_inv2)
hence "inv2 (rbt_del k t) ∧ inv1l (rbt_del k t)" by (cases "color_of t") auto
with assms show ?thesis
unfolding is_rbt_def rbt_delete_def
by (auto intro: paint_rbt_sorted rbt_del_rbt_sorted)
qed
lemma rbt_delete_in_tree:
assumes "is_rbt t"
shows "entry_in_tree k v (rbt_delete x t) = (x ≠ k ∧ entry_in_tree k v t)"
using assms unfolding is_rbt_def rbt_delete_def
by (auto simp: rbt_del_in_tree)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_delete:
assumes is_rbt: "is_rbt t"
shows "rbt_lookup (rbt_delete k t) = (rbt_lookup t)|`(-{k})"
proof
fix x
show "rbt_lookup (rbt_delete k t) x = (rbt_lookup t |` (-{k})) x"
proof (cases "x = k")
assume "x = k"
with is_rbt show ?thesis
by (cases "rbt_lookup (rbt_delete k t) k") (auto simp: rbt_lookup_in_tree rbt_delete_in_tree)
next
assume "x ≠ k"
thus ?thesis
by auto (metis is_rbt rbt_delete_is_rbt rbt_delete_in_tree is_rbt_rbt_sorted rbt_lookup_from_in_tree)
qed
qed
end
subsection {* Modifying existing entries *}
context ord begin
primrec
rbt_map_entry :: "'a => ('b => 'b) => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt"
where
"rbt_map_entry k f Empty = Empty"
| "rbt_map_entry k f (Branch c lt x v rt) =
(if k < x then Branch c (rbt_map_entry k f lt) x v rt
else if k > x then (Branch c lt x v (rbt_map_entry k f rt))
else Branch c lt x (f v) rt)"
lemma rbt_map_entry_color_of: "color_of (rbt_map_entry k f t) = color_of t" by (induct t) simp+
lemma rbt_map_entry_inv1: "inv1 (rbt_map_entry k f t) = inv1 t" by (induct t) (simp add: rbt_map_entry_color_of)+
lemma rbt_map_entry_inv2: "inv2 (rbt_map_entry k f t) = inv2 t" "bheight (rbt_map_entry k f t) = bheight t" by (induct t) simp+
lemma rbt_map_entry_rbt_greater: "rbt_greater a (rbt_map_entry k f t) = rbt_greater a t" by (induct t) simp+
lemma rbt_map_entry_rbt_less: "rbt_less a (rbt_map_entry k f t) = rbt_less a t" by (induct t) simp+
lemma rbt_map_entry_rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted (rbt_map_entry k f t) = rbt_sorted t"
by (induct t) (simp_all add: rbt_map_entry_rbt_less rbt_map_entry_rbt_greater)
theorem rbt_map_entry_is_rbt [simp]: "is_rbt (rbt_map_entry k f t) = is_rbt t"
unfolding is_rbt_def by (simp add: rbt_map_entry_inv2 rbt_map_entry_color_of rbt_map_entry_rbt_sorted rbt_map_entry_inv1 )
end
theorem (in linorder) rbt_lookup_rbt_map_entry:
"rbt_lookup (rbt_map_entry k f t) = (rbt_lookup t)(k := Option.map f (rbt_lookup t k))"
by (induct t) (auto split: option.splits simp add: fun_eq_iff)
subsection {* Mapping all entries *}
primrec
map :: "('a => 'b => 'c) => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'c) rbt"
where
"map f Empty = Empty"
| "map f (Branch c lt k v rt) = Branch c (map f lt) k (f k v) (map f rt)"
lemma map_entries [simp]: "entries (map f t) = List.map (λ(k, v). (k, f k v)) (entries t)"
by (induct t) auto
lemma map_keys [simp]: "keys (map f t) = keys t" by (simp add: keys_def split_def)
lemma map_color_of: "color_of (map f t) = color_of t" by (induct t) simp+
lemma map_inv1: "inv1 (map f t) = inv1 t" by (induct t) (simp add: map_color_of)+
lemma map_inv2: "inv2 (map f t) = inv2 t" "bheight (map f t) = bheight t" by (induct t) simp+
context ord begin
lemma map_rbt_greater: "rbt_greater k (map f t) = rbt_greater k t" by (induct t) simp+
lemma map_rbt_less: "rbt_less k (map f t) = rbt_less k t" by (induct t) simp+
lemma map_rbt_sorted: "rbt_sorted (map f t) = rbt_sorted t" by (induct t) (simp add: map_rbt_less map_rbt_greater)+
theorem map_is_rbt [simp]: "is_rbt (map f t) = is_rbt t"
unfolding is_rbt_def by (simp add: map_inv1 map_inv2 map_rbt_sorted map_color_of)
end
theorem (in linorder) rbt_lookup_map: "rbt_lookup (map f t) x = Option.map (f x) (rbt_lookup t x)"
apply(induct t)
apply auto
apply(subgoal_tac "x = a")
apply auto
done
hide_const (open) map
subsection {* Folding over entries *}
definition fold :: "('a => 'b => 'c => 'c) => ('a, 'b) rbt => 'c => 'c" where
"fold f t = List.fold (prod_case f) (entries t)"
lemma fold_simps [simp]:
"fold f Empty = id"
"fold f (Branch c lt k v rt) = fold f rt o f k v o fold f lt"
by (simp_all add: fold_def fun_eq_iff)
lemma fold_code [code]:
"fold f Empty x = x"
"fold f (Branch c lt k v rt) x = fold f rt (f k v (fold f lt x))"
by(simp_all)
fun foldi :: "('c => bool) => ('a => 'b => 'c => 'c) => ('a :: linorder, 'b) rbt => 'c => 'c"
where
"foldi c f Empty s = s" |
"foldi c f (Branch col l k v r) s = (
if (c s) then
let s' = foldi c f l s in
if (c s') then
foldi c f r (f k v s')
else s'
else
s
)"
subsection {* Bulkloading a tree *}
definition (in ord) rbt_bulkload :: "('a × 'b) list => ('a, 'b) rbt" where
"rbt_bulkload xs = foldr (λ(k, v). rbt_insert k v) xs Empty"
context linorder begin
lemma rbt_bulkload_is_rbt [simp, intro]:
"is_rbt (rbt_bulkload xs)"
unfolding rbt_bulkload_def by (induct xs) auto
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_bulkload:
"rbt_lookup (rbt_bulkload xs) = map_of xs"
proof -
obtain ys where "ys = rev xs" by simp
have "!!t. is_rbt t ==>
rbt_lookup (List.fold (prod_case rbt_insert) ys t) = rbt_lookup t ++ map_of (rev ys)"
by (induct ys) (simp_all add: rbt_bulkload_def rbt_lookup_rbt_insert prod_case_beta)
from this Empty_is_rbt have
"rbt_lookup (List.fold (prod_case rbt_insert) (rev xs) Empty) = rbt_lookup Empty ++ map_of xs"
by (simp add: `ys = rev xs`)
then show ?thesis by (simp add: rbt_bulkload_def rbt_lookup_Empty foldr_conv_fold)
qed
end
subsection {* Building a RBT from a sorted list *}
text {*
These functions have been adapted from
Andrew W. Appel, Efficient Verified Red-Black Trees (September 2011)
*}
fun rbtreeify_f :: "nat => ('a × 'b) list => ('a, 'b) rbt × ('a × 'b) list"
and rbtreeify_g :: "nat => ('a × 'b) list => ('a, 'b) rbt × ('a × 'b) list"
where
"rbtreeify_f n kvs =
(if n = 0 then (Empty, kvs)
else if n = 1 then
case kvs of (k, v) # kvs' => (Branch R Empty k v Empty, kvs')
else if (n mod 2 = 0) then
case rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs')
else case rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs'))"
| "rbtreeify_g n kvs =
(if n = 0 ∨ n = 1 then (Empty, kvs)
else if n mod 2 = 0 then
case rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs')
else case rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs'))"
definition rbtreeify :: "('a × 'b) list => ('a, 'b) rbt"
where "rbtreeify kvs = fst (rbtreeify_g (Suc (length kvs)) kvs)"
declare rbtreeify_f.simps [simp del] rbtreeify_g.simps [simp del]
lemma rbtreeify_f_code [code]:
"rbtreeify_f n kvs =
(if n = 0 then (Empty, kvs)
else if n = 1 then
case kvs of (k, v) # kvs' =>
(Branch R Empty k v Empty, kvs')
else let (n', r) = divmod_nat n 2 in
if r = 0 then
case rbtreeify_f n' kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g n' kvs')
else case rbtreeify_f n' kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_f n' kvs'))"
by(subst rbtreeify_f.simps)(simp only: Let_def divmod_nat_div_mod prod.simps)
lemma rbtreeify_g_code [code]:
"rbtreeify_g n kvs =
(if n = 0 ∨ n = 1 then (Empty, kvs)
else let (n', r) = divmod_nat n 2 in
if r = 0 then
case rbtreeify_g n' kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g n' kvs')
else case rbtreeify_f n' kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g n' kvs'))"
by(subst rbtreeify_g.simps)(simp only: Let_def divmod_nat_div_mod prod.simps)
lemma Suc_double_half: "Suc (2 * n) div 2 = n"
by simp
lemma div2_plus_div2: "n div 2 + n div 2 = (n :: nat) - n mod 2"
by arith
lemma rbtreeify_f_rec_aux_lemma:
"[|k - n div 2 = Suc k'; n ≤ k; n mod 2 = Suc 0|]
==> k' - n div 2 = k - n"
apply(rule add_right_imp_eq[where a = "n - n div 2"])
apply(subst add_diff_assoc2, arith)
apply(simp add: div2_plus_div2)
done
lemma rbtreeify_f_simps:
"rbtreeify_f 0 kvs = (RBT_Impl.Empty, kvs)"
"rbtreeify_f (Suc 0) ((k, v) # kvs) =
(Branch R Empty k v Empty, kvs)"
"0 < n ==> rbtreeify_f (2 * n) kvs =
(case rbtreeify_f n kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g n kvs'))"
"0 < n ==> rbtreeify_f (Suc (2 * n)) kvs =
(case rbtreeify_f n kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_f n kvs'))"
by(subst (1) rbtreeify_f.simps, simp add: Suc_double_half)+
lemma rbtreeify_g_simps:
"rbtreeify_g 0 kvs = (Empty, kvs)"
"rbtreeify_g (Suc 0) kvs = (Empty, kvs)"
"0 < n ==> rbtreeify_g (2 * n) kvs =
(case rbtreeify_g n kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g n kvs'))"
"0 < n ==> rbtreeify_g (Suc (2 * n)) kvs =
(case rbtreeify_f n kvs of (t1, (k, v) # kvs') =>
apfst (Branch B t1 k v) (rbtreeify_g n kvs'))"
by(subst (1) rbtreeify_g.simps, simp add: Suc_double_half)+
declare rbtreeify_f_simps[simp] rbtreeify_g_simps[simp]
lemma length_rbtreeify_f: "n ≤ length kvs
==> length (snd (rbtreeify_f n kvs)) = length kvs - n"
and length_rbtreeify_g:"[| 0 < n; n ≤ Suc (length kvs) |]
==> length (snd (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) = Suc (length kvs) - n"
proof(induction n kvs and n kvs rule: rbtreeify_f_rbtreeify_g.induct)
case (1 n kvs)
show ?case
proof(cases "n ≤ 1")
case True thus ?thesis using "1.prems"
by(cases n kvs rule: nat.exhaust[case_product list.exhaust]) auto
next
case False
hence "n ≠ 0" "n ≠ 1" by simp_all
note IH = "1.IH"[OF this]
show ?thesis
proof(cases "n mod 2 = 0")
case True
hence "length (snd (rbtreeify_f n kvs)) =
length (snd (rbtreeify_f (2 * (n div 2)) kvs))"
by(metis minus_nat.diff_0 mult_div_cancel)
also from "1.prems" False obtain k v kvs'
where kvs: "kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by(cases kvs) auto
also have "0 < n div 2" using False by(simp)
note rbtreeify_f_simps(3)[OF this]
also note kvs[symmetric]
also let ?rest1 = "snd (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs)"
from "1.prems" have "n div 2 ≤ length kvs" by simp
with True have len: "length ?rest1 = length kvs - n div 2" by(rule IH)
with "1.prems" False obtain t1 k' v' kvs''
where kvs'': "rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs = (t1, (k', v') # kvs'')"
by(cases ?rest1)(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm)
note this also note prod.simps(2) also note list.simps(5)
also note prod.simps(2) also note snd_apfst
also have "0 < n div 2" "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs'')"
using len "1.prems" False unfolding kvs'' by simp_all
with True kvs''[symmetric] refl refl
have "length (snd (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs'')) =
Suc (length kvs'') - n div 2" by(rule IH)
finally show ?thesis using len[unfolded kvs''] "1.prems" True
by(simp add: Suc_diff_le[symmetric] mult_2[symmetric] mult_div_cancel)
next
case False
hence "length (snd (rbtreeify_f n kvs)) =
length (snd (rbtreeify_f (Suc (2 * (n div 2))) kvs))"
by(metis Suc_eq_plus1_left comm_semiring_1_class.normalizing_semiring_rules(7)
mod_2_not_eq_zero_eq_one_nat semiring_div_class.mod_div_equality')
also from "1.prems" `¬ n ≤ 1` obtain k v kvs'
where kvs: "kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by(cases kvs) auto
also have "0 < n div 2" using `¬ n ≤ 1` by(simp)
note rbtreeify_f_simps(4)[OF this]
also note kvs[symmetric]
also let ?rest1 = "snd (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs)"
from "1.prems" have "n div 2 ≤ length kvs" by simp
with False have len: "length ?rest1 = length kvs - n div 2" by(rule IH)
with "1.prems" `¬ n ≤ 1` obtain t1 k' v' kvs''
where kvs'': "rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs = (t1, (k', v') # kvs'')"
by(cases ?rest1)(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm)
note this also note prod.simps(2) also note list.simps(5)
also note prod.simps(2) also note snd_apfst
also have "n div 2 ≤ length kvs''"
using len "1.prems" False unfolding kvs'' by simp arith
with False kvs''[symmetric] refl refl
have "length (snd (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs'')) = length kvs'' - n div 2"
by(rule IH)
finally show ?thesis using len[unfolded kvs''] "1.prems" False
by simp(rule rbtreeify_f_rec_aux_lemma[OF sym])
qed
qed
next
case (2 n kvs)
show ?case
proof(cases "n > 1")
case False with `0 < n` show ?thesis
by(cases n kvs rule: nat.exhaust[case_product list.exhaust]) simp_all
next
case True
hence "¬ (n = 0 ∨ n = 1)" by simp
note IH = "2.IH"[OF this]
show ?thesis
proof(cases "n mod 2 = 0")
case True
hence "length (snd (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) =
length (snd (rbtreeify_g (2 * (n div 2)) kvs))"
by(metis minus_nat.diff_0 mult_div_cancel)
also from "2.prems" True obtain k v kvs'
where kvs: "kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by(cases kvs) auto
also have "0 < n div 2" using `1 < n` by(simp)
note rbtreeify_g_simps(3)[OF this]
also note kvs[symmetric]
also let ?rest1 = "snd (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs)"
from "2.prems" `1 < n`
have "0 < n div 2" "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs)" by simp_all
with True have len: "length ?rest1 = Suc (length kvs) - n div 2" by(rule IH)
with "2.prems" obtain t1 k' v' kvs''
where kvs'': "rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs = (t1, (k', v') # kvs'')"
by(cases ?rest1)(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm)
note this also note prod.simps(2) also note list.simps(5)
also note prod.simps(2) also note snd_apfst
also have "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs'')"
using len "2.prems" unfolding kvs'' by simp
with True kvs''[symmetric] refl refl `0 < n div 2`
have "length (snd (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs'')) = Suc (length kvs'') - n div 2"
by(rule IH)
finally show ?thesis using len[unfolded kvs''] "2.prems" True
by(simp add: Suc_diff_le[symmetric] mult_2[symmetric] mult_div_cancel)
next
case False
hence "length (snd (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) =
length (snd (rbtreeify_g (Suc (2 * (n div 2))) kvs))"
by(metis Suc_eq_plus1_left comm_semiring_1_class.normalizing_semiring_rules(7)
mod_2_not_eq_zero_eq_one_nat semiring_div_class.mod_div_equality')
also from "2.prems" `1 < n` obtain k v kvs'
where kvs: "kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by(cases kvs) auto
also have "0 < n div 2" using `1 < n` by(simp)
note rbtreeify_g_simps(4)[OF this]
also note kvs[symmetric]
also let ?rest1 = "snd (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs)"
from "2.prems" have "n div 2 ≤ length kvs" by simp
with False have len: "length ?rest1 = length kvs - n div 2" by(rule IH)
with "2.prems" `1 < n` False obtain t1 k' v' kvs''
where kvs'': "rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs = (t1, (k', v') # kvs'')"
by(cases ?rest1)(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm, arith)
note this also note prod.simps(2) also note list.simps(5)
also note prod.simps(2) also note snd_apfst
also have "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs'')"
using len "2.prems" False unfolding kvs'' by simp arith
with False kvs''[symmetric] refl refl `0 < n div 2`
have "length (snd (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs'')) = Suc (length kvs'') - n div 2"
by(rule IH)
finally show ?thesis using len[unfolded kvs''] "2.prems" False
by(simp add: div2_plus_div2)
qed
qed
qed
lemma rbtreeify_induct [consumes 1, case_names f_0 f_1 f_even f_odd g_0 g_1 g_even g_odd]:
fixes P Q
defines "f0 == (!!kvs. P 0 kvs)"
and "f1 == (!!k v kvs. P (Suc 0) ((k, v) # kvs))"
and "feven ==
(!!n kvs t k v kvs'. [| n > 0; n ≤ length kvs; P n kvs;
rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs'); n ≤ Suc (length kvs'); Q n kvs' |]
==> P (2 * n) kvs)"
and "fodd ==
(!!n kvs t k v kvs'. [| n > 0; n ≤ length kvs; P n kvs;
rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs'); n ≤ length kvs'; P n kvs' |]
==> P (Suc (2 * n)) kvs)"
and "g0 == (!!kvs. Q 0 kvs)"
and "g1 == (!!kvs. Q (Suc 0) kvs)"
and "geven ==
(!!n kvs t k v kvs'. [| n > 0; n ≤ Suc (length kvs); Q n kvs;
rbtreeify_g n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs'); n ≤ Suc (length kvs'); Q n kvs' |]
==> Q (2 * n) kvs)"
and "godd ==
(!!n kvs t k v kvs'. [| n > 0; n ≤ length kvs; P n kvs;
rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs'); n ≤ Suc (length kvs'); Q n kvs' |]
==> Q (Suc (2 * n)) kvs)"
shows "[| n ≤ length kvs;
PROP f0; PROP f1; PROP feven; PROP fodd;
PROP g0; PROP g1; PROP geven; PROP godd |]
==> P n kvs"
and "[| n ≤ Suc (length kvs);
PROP f0; PROP f1; PROP feven; PROP fodd;
PROP g0; PROP g1; PROP geven; PROP godd |]
==> Q n kvs"
proof -
assume f0: "PROP f0" and f1: "PROP f1" and feven: "PROP feven" and fodd: "PROP fodd"
and g0: "PROP g0" and g1: "PROP g1" and geven: "PROP geven" and godd: "PROP godd"
show "n ≤ length kvs ==> P n kvs" and "n ≤ Suc (length kvs) ==> Q n kvs"
proof(induction rule: rbtreeify_f_rbtreeify_g.induct)
case (1 n kvs)
show ?case
proof(cases "n ≤ 1")
case True thus ?thesis using "1.prems"
by(cases n kvs rule: nat.exhaust[case_product list.exhaust])
(auto simp add: f0[unfolded f0_def] f1[unfolded f1_def])
next
case False
hence ns: "n ≠ 0" "n ≠ 1" by simp_all
hence ge0: "n div 2 > 0" by simp
note IH = "1.IH"[OF ns]
show ?thesis
proof(cases "n mod 2 = 0")
case True note ge0
moreover from "1.prems" have n2: "n div 2 ≤ length kvs" by simp
moreover with True have "P (n div 2) kvs" by(rule IH)
moreover from length_rbtreeify_f[OF n2] ge0 "1.prems" obtain t k v kvs'
where kvs': "rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')"
by(cases "snd (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs)")
(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm)
moreover from "1.prems" length_rbtreeify_f[OF n2] ge0
have "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs')" by(simp add: kvs')
moreover with True kvs'[symmetric] refl refl
have "Q (n div 2) kvs'" by(rule IH)
moreover note feven[unfolded feven_def]
ultimately have "P (2 * (n div 2)) kvs" by -
thus ?thesis using True by (metis div_mod_equality' minus_nat.diff_0 nat_mult_commute)
next
case False note ge0
moreover from "1.prems" have n2: "n div 2 ≤ length kvs" by simp
moreover with False have "P (n div 2) kvs" by(rule IH)
moreover from length_rbtreeify_f[OF n2] ge0 "1.prems" obtain t k v kvs'
where kvs': "rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')"
by(cases "snd (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs)")
(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm)
moreover from "1.prems" length_rbtreeify_f[OF n2] ge0 False
have "n div 2 ≤ length kvs'" by(simp add: kvs') arith
moreover with False kvs'[symmetric] refl refl have "P (n div 2) kvs'" by(rule IH)
moreover note fodd[unfolded fodd_def]
ultimately have "P (Suc (2 * (n div 2))) kvs" by -
thus ?thesis using False
by simp (metis One_nat_def Suc_eq_plus1_left le_add_diff_inverse mod_less_eq_dividend mult_div_cancel)
qed
qed
next
case (2 n kvs)
show ?case
proof(cases "n ≤ 1")
case True thus ?thesis using "2.prems"
by(cases n kvs rule: nat.exhaust[case_product list.exhaust])
(auto simp add: g0[unfolded g0_def] g1[unfolded g1_def])
next
case False
hence ns: "¬ (n = 0 ∨ n = 1)" by simp
hence ge0: "n div 2 > 0" by simp
note IH = "2.IH"[OF ns]
show ?thesis
proof(cases "n mod 2 = 0")
case True note ge0
moreover from "2.prems" have n2: "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs)" by simp
moreover with True have "Q (n div 2) kvs" by(rule IH)
moreover from length_rbtreeify_g[OF ge0 n2] ge0 "2.prems" obtain t k v kvs'
where kvs': "rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')"
by(cases "snd (rbtreeify_g (n div 2) kvs)")
(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm)
moreover from "2.prems" length_rbtreeify_g[OF ge0 n2] ge0
have "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs')" by(simp add: kvs')
moreover with True kvs'[symmetric] refl refl
have "Q (n div 2) kvs'" by(rule IH)
moreover note geven[unfolded geven_def]
ultimately have "Q (2 * (n div 2)) kvs" by -
thus ?thesis using True
by(metis div_mod_equality' minus_nat.diff_0 nat_mult_commute)
next
case False note ge0
moreover from "2.prems" have n2: "n div 2 ≤ length kvs" by simp
moreover with False have "P (n div 2) kvs" by(rule IH)
moreover from length_rbtreeify_f[OF n2] ge0 "2.prems" False obtain t k v kvs'
where kvs': "rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')"
by(cases "snd (rbtreeify_f (n div 2) kvs)")
(auto simp add: snd_def split: prod.split_asm, arith)
moreover from "2.prems" length_rbtreeify_f[OF n2] ge0 False
have "n div 2 ≤ Suc (length kvs')" by(simp add: kvs') arith
moreover with False kvs'[symmetric] refl refl
have "Q (n div 2) kvs'" by(rule IH)
moreover note godd[unfolded godd_def]
ultimately have "Q (Suc (2 * (n div 2))) kvs" by -
thus ?thesis using False
by simp (metis One_nat_def Suc_eq_plus1_left le_add_diff_inverse mod_less_eq_dividend mult_div_cancel)
qed
qed
qed
qed
lemma inv1_rbtreeify_f: "n ≤ length kvs
==> inv1 (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs))"
and inv1_rbtreeify_g: "n ≤ Suc (length kvs)
==> inv1 (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs))"
by(induct n kvs and n kvs rule: rbtreeify_induct) simp_all
fun plog2 :: "nat => nat"
where "plog2 n = (if n ≤ 1 then 0 else plog2 (n div 2) + 1)"
declare plog2.simps [simp del]
lemma plog2_simps [simp]:
"plog2 0 = 0" "plog2 (Suc 0) = 0"
"0 < n ==> plog2 (2 * n) = 1 + plog2 n"
"0 < n ==> plog2 (Suc (2 * n)) = 1 + plog2 n"
by(subst plog2.simps, simp add: Suc_double_half)+
lemma bheight_rbtreeify_f: "n ≤ length kvs
==> bheight (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs)) = plog2 n"
and bheight_rbtreeify_g: "n ≤ Suc (length kvs)
==> bheight (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) = plog2 n"
by(induct n kvs and n kvs rule: rbtreeify_induct) simp_all
lemma bheight_rbtreeify_f_eq_plog2I:
"[| rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, kvs'); n ≤ length kvs |]
==> bheight t = plog2 n"
using bheight_rbtreeify_f[of n kvs] by simp
lemma bheight_rbtreeify_g_eq_plog2I:
"[| rbtreeify_g n kvs = (t, kvs'); n ≤ Suc (length kvs) |]
==> bheight t = plog2 n"
using bheight_rbtreeify_g[of n kvs] by simp
hide_const (open) plog2
lemma inv2_rbtreeify_f: "n ≤ length kvs
==> inv2 (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs))"
and inv2_rbtreeify_g: "n ≤ Suc (length kvs)
==> inv2 (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs))"
by(induct n kvs and n kvs rule: rbtreeify_induct)
(auto simp add: bheight_rbtreeify_f bheight_rbtreeify_g
intro: bheight_rbtreeify_f_eq_plog2I bheight_rbtreeify_g_eq_plog2I)
lemma "n ≤ length kvs ==> True"
and color_of_rbtreeify_g:
"[| n ≤ Suc (length kvs); 0 < n |]
==> color_of (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) = B"
by(induct n kvs and n kvs rule: rbtreeify_induct) simp_all
lemma entries_rbtreeify_f_append:
"n ≤ length kvs
==> entries (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs)) @ snd (rbtreeify_f n kvs) = kvs"
and entries_rbtreeify_g_append:
"n ≤ Suc (length kvs)
==> entries (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) @ snd (rbtreeify_g n kvs) = kvs"
by(induction rule: rbtreeify_induct) simp_all
lemma length_entries_rbtreeify_f:
"n ≤ length kvs ==> length (entries (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs))) = n"
and length_entries_rbtreeify_g:
"n ≤ Suc (length kvs) ==> length (entries (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs))) = n - 1"
by(induct rule: rbtreeify_induct) simp_all
lemma rbtreeify_f_conv_drop:
"n ≤ length kvs ==> snd (rbtreeify_f n kvs) = drop n kvs"
using entries_rbtreeify_f_append[of n kvs]
by(simp add: append_eq_conv_conj length_entries_rbtreeify_f)
lemma rbtreeify_g_conv_drop:
"n ≤ Suc (length kvs) ==> snd (rbtreeify_g n kvs) = drop (n - 1) kvs"
using entries_rbtreeify_g_append[of n kvs]
by(simp add: append_eq_conv_conj length_entries_rbtreeify_g)
lemma entries_rbtreeify_f [simp]:
"n ≤ length kvs ==> entries (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs)) = take n kvs"
using entries_rbtreeify_f_append[of n kvs]
by(simp add: append_eq_conv_conj length_entries_rbtreeify_f)
lemma entries_rbtreeify_g [simp]:
"n ≤ Suc (length kvs) ==>
entries (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) = take (n - 1) kvs"
using entries_rbtreeify_g_append[of n kvs]
by(simp add: append_eq_conv_conj length_entries_rbtreeify_g)
lemma keys_rbtreeify_f [simp]: "n ≤ length kvs
==> keys (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs)) = take n (map fst kvs)"
by(simp add: keys_def take_map)
lemma keys_rbtreeify_g [simp]: "n ≤ Suc (length kvs)
==> keys (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs)) = take (n - 1) (map fst kvs)"
by(simp add: keys_def take_map)
lemma rbtreeify_fD:
"[| rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, kvs'); n ≤ length kvs |]
==> entries t = take n kvs ∧ kvs' = drop n kvs"
using rbtreeify_f_conv_drop[of n kvs] entries_rbtreeify_f[of n kvs] by simp
lemma rbtreeify_gD:
"[| rbtreeify_g n kvs = (t, kvs'); n ≤ Suc (length kvs) |]
==> entries t = take (n - 1) kvs ∧ kvs' = drop (n - 1) kvs"
using rbtreeify_g_conv_drop[of n kvs] entries_rbtreeify_g[of n kvs] by simp
lemma entries_rbtreeify [simp]: "entries (rbtreeify kvs) = kvs"
by(simp add: rbtreeify_def entries_rbtreeify_g)
context linorder begin
lemma rbt_sorted_rbtreeify_f:
"[| n ≤ length kvs; sorted (map fst kvs); distinct (map fst kvs) |]
==> rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs))"
and rbt_sorted_rbtreeify_g:
"[| n ≤ Suc (length kvs); sorted (map fst kvs); distinct (map fst kvs) |]
==> rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs))"
proof(induction n kvs and n kvs rule: rbtreeify_induct)
case (f_even n kvs t k v kvs')
from rbtreeify_fD[OF `rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` `n ≤ length kvs`]
have "entries t = take n kvs"
and kvs': "drop n kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by simp_all
hence unfold: "kvs = take n kvs @ (k, v) # kvs'" by(metis append_take_drop_id)
from `sorted (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x ≤ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k ≤ x)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)
moreover from `distinct (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x ≠ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. x ≠ k)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto intro: rev_image_eqI)
ultimately have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x < k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k < x)"
by fastforce
hence "fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs) |« k" "k «| fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs')"
using `n ≤ Suc (length kvs')` `n ≤ length kvs` set_take_subset[of "n - 1" kvs']
by(auto simp add: ord.rbt_greater_prop ord.rbt_less_prop take_map split_def)
moreover from `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
have "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs))" by(rule f_even.IH)
moreover have "sorted (map fst kvs')" "distinct (map fst kvs')"
using `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
by(subst (asm) (1 2) unfold, simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)+
hence "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs'))" by(rule f_even.IH)
ultimately show ?case
using `0 < n` `rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` by simp
next
case (f_odd n kvs t k v kvs')
from rbtreeify_fD[OF `rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` `n ≤ length kvs`]
have "entries t = take n kvs"
and kvs': "drop n kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by simp_all
hence unfold: "kvs = take n kvs @ (k, v) # kvs'" by(metis append_take_drop_id)
from `sorted (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x ≤ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k ≤ x)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)
moreover from `distinct (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x ≠ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. x ≠ k)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto intro: rev_image_eqI)
ultimately have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x < k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k < x)"
by fastforce
hence "fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs) |« k" "k «| fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs')"
using `n ≤ length kvs'` `n ≤ length kvs` set_take_subset[of n kvs']
by(auto simp add: rbt_greater_prop rbt_less_prop take_map split_def)
moreover from `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
have "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs))" by(rule f_odd.IH)
moreover have "sorted (map fst kvs')" "distinct (map fst kvs')"
using `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
by(subst (asm) (1 2) unfold, simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)+
hence "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs'))" by(rule f_odd.IH)
ultimately show ?case
using `0 < n` `rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` by simp
next
case (g_even n kvs t k v kvs')
from rbtreeify_gD[OF `rbtreeify_g n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` `n ≤ Suc (length kvs)`]
have t: "entries t = take (n - 1) kvs"
and kvs': "drop (n - 1) kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by simp_all
hence unfold: "kvs = take (n - 1) kvs @ (k, v) # kvs'" by(metis append_take_drop_id)
from `sorted (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take (n - 1) kvs). x ≤ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k ≤ x)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)
moreover from `distinct (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take (n - 1) kvs). x ≠ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. x ≠ k)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto intro: rev_image_eqI)
ultimately have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take (n - 1) kvs). x < k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k < x)"
by fastforce
hence "fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs) |« k" "k «| fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs')"
using `n ≤ Suc (length kvs')` `n ≤ Suc (length kvs)` set_take_subset[of "n - 1" kvs']
by(auto simp add: rbt_greater_prop rbt_less_prop take_map split_def)
moreover from `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
have "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs))" by(rule g_even.IH)
moreover have "sorted (map fst kvs')" "distinct (map fst kvs')"
using `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
by(subst (asm) (1 2) unfold, simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)+
hence "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs'))" by(rule g_even.IH)
ultimately show ?case using `0 < n` `rbtreeify_g n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` by simp
next
case (g_odd n kvs t k v kvs')
from rbtreeify_fD[OF `rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` `n ≤ length kvs`]
have "entries t = take n kvs"
and kvs': "drop n kvs = (k, v) # kvs'" by simp_all
hence unfold: "kvs = take n kvs @ (k, v) # kvs'" by(metis append_take_drop_id)
from `sorted (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x ≤ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k ≤ x)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)
moreover from `distinct (map fst kvs)` kvs'
have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x ≠ k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. x ≠ k)"
by(subst (asm) unfold)(auto intro: rev_image_eqI)
ultimately have "(∀(x, y) ∈ set (take n kvs). x < k) ∧ (∀(x, y) ∈ set kvs'. k < x)"
by fastforce
hence "fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs) |« k" "k «| fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs')"
using `n ≤ Suc (length kvs')` `n ≤ length kvs` set_take_subset[of "n - 1" kvs']
by(auto simp add: rbt_greater_prop rbt_less_prop take_map split_def)
moreover from `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
have "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_f n kvs))" by(rule g_odd.IH)
moreover have "sorted (map fst kvs')" "distinct (map fst kvs')"
using `sorted (map fst kvs)` `distinct (map fst kvs)`
by(subst (asm) (1 2) unfold, simp add: sorted_append sorted_Cons)+
hence "rbt_sorted (fst (rbtreeify_g n kvs'))" by(rule g_odd.IH)
ultimately show ?case
using `0 < n` `rbtreeify_f n kvs = (t, (k, v) # kvs')` by simp
qed simp_all
lemma rbt_sorted_rbtreeify:
"[| sorted (map fst kvs); distinct (map fst kvs) |] ==> rbt_sorted (rbtreeify kvs)"
by(simp add: rbtreeify_def rbt_sorted_rbtreeify_g)
lemma is_rbt_rbtreeify:
"[| sorted (map fst kvs); distinct (map fst kvs) |]
==> is_rbt (rbtreeify kvs)"
by(simp add: is_rbt_def rbtreeify_def inv1_rbtreeify_g inv2_rbtreeify_g rbt_sorted_rbtreeify_g color_of_rbtreeify_g)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbtreeify:
"[| sorted (map fst kvs); distinct (map fst kvs) |] ==>
rbt_lookup (rbtreeify kvs) = map_of kvs"
by(simp add: map_of_entries[symmetric] rbt_sorted_rbtreeify)
end
text {*
Functions to compare the height of two rbt trees, taken from
Andrew W. Appel, Efficient Verified Red-Black Trees (September 2011)
*}
fun skip_red :: "('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt"
where
"skip_red (Branch color.R l k v r) = l"
| "skip_red t = t"
definition skip_black :: "('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt"
where
"skip_black t = (let t' = skip_red t in case t' of Branch color.B l k v r => l | _ => t')"
datatype compare = LT | GT | EQ
partial_function (tailrec) compare_height :: "('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt => compare"
where
"compare_height sx s t tx =
(case (skip_red sx, skip_red s, skip_red t, skip_red tx) of
(Branch _ sx' _ _ _, Branch _ s' _ _ _, Branch _ t' _ _ _, Branch _ tx' _ _ _) =>
compare_height (skip_black sx') s' t' (skip_black tx')
| (_, rbt.Empty, _, Branch _ _ _ _ _) => LT
| (Branch _ _ _ _ _, _, rbt.Empty, _) => GT
| (Branch _ sx' _ _ _, Branch _ s' _ _ _, Branch _ t' _ _ _, rbt.Empty) =>
compare_height (skip_black sx') s' t' rbt.Empty
| (rbt.Empty, Branch _ s' _ _ _, Branch _ t' _ _ _, Branch _ tx' _ _ _) =>
compare_height rbt.Empty s' t' (skip_black tx')
| _ => EQ)"
declare compare_height.simps [code]
hide_type (open) compare
hide_const (open)
compare_height skip_black skip_red LT GT EQ compare_case compare_rec
Abs_compare Rep_compare compare_rep_set
hide_fact (open)
Abs_compare_cases Abs_compare_induct Abs_compare_inject Abs_compare_inverse
Rep_compare Rep_compare_cases Rep_compare_induct Rep_compare_inject Rep_compare_inverse
compare.simps compare.exhaust compare.induct compare.recs compare.simps
compare.size compare.case_cong compare.weak_case_cong compare.cases
compare.nchotomy compare.split compare.split_asm compare_rec_def
compare.eq.refl compare.eq.simps
compare.EQ_def compare.GT_def compare.LT_def
equal_compare_def
skip_red_def skip_red.simps skip_red.cases skip_red.induct
skip_black_def
compare_height_def compare_height.simps
subsection {* union and intersection of sorted associative lists *}
context ord begin
function sunion_with :: "('a => 'b => 'b => 'b) => ('a × 'b) list => ('a × 'b) list => ('a × 'b) list"
where
"sunion_with f ((k, v) # as) ((k', v') # bs) =
(if k > k' then (k', v') # sunion_with f ((k, v) # as) bs
else if k < k' then (k, v) # sunion_with f as ((k', v') # bs)
else (k, f k v v') # sunion_with f as bs)"
| "sunion_with f [] bs = bs"
| "sunion_with f as [] = as"
by pat_completeness auto
termination by lexicographic_order
function sinter_with :: "('a => 'b => 'b => 'b) => ('a × 'b) list => ('a × 'b) list => ('a × 'b) list"
where
"sinter_with f ((k, v) # as) ((k', v') # bs) =
(if k > k' then sinter_with f ((k, v) # as) bs
else if k < k' then sinter_with f as ((k', v') # bs)
else (k, f k v v') # sinter_with f as bs)"
| "sinter_with f [] _ = []"
| "sinter_with f _ [] = []"
by pat_completeness auto
termination by lexicographic_order
end
declare ord.sunion_with.simps [code] ord.sinter_with.simps[code]
context linorder begin
lemma set_fst_sunion_with:
"set (map fst (sunion_with f xs ys)) = set (map fst xs) ∪ set (map fst ys)"
by(induct f xs ys rule: sunion_with.induct) auto
lemma sorted_sunion_with [simp]:
"[| sorted (map fst xs); sorted (map fst ys) |]
==> sorted (map fst (sunion_with f xs ys))"
by(induct f xs ys rule: sunion_with.induct)
(auto simp add: sorted_Cons set_fst_sunion_with simp del: set_map)
lemma distinct_sunion_with [simp]:
"[| distinct (map fst xs); distinct (map fst ys); sorted (map fst xs); sorted (map fst ys) |]
==> distinct (map fst (sunion_with f xs ys))"
proof(induct f xs ys rule: sunion_with.induct)
case (1 f k v xs k' v' ys)
have "[| ¬ k < k'; ¬ k' < k |] ==> k = k'" by simp
thus ?case using "1"
by(auto simp add: set_fst_sunion_with sorted_Cons simp del: set_map)
qed simp_all
lemma map_of_sunion_with:
"[| sorted (map fst xs); sorted (map fst ys) |]
==> map_of (sunion_with f xs ys) k =
(case map_of xs k of None => map_of ys k
| Some v => case map_of ys k of None => Some v
| Some w => Some (f k v w))"
by(induct f xs ys rule: sunion_with.induct)(auto simp add: sorted_Cons split: option.split dest: map_of_SomeD bspec)
lemma set_fst_sinter_with [simp]:
"[| sorted (map fst xs); sorted (map fst ys) |]
==> set (map fst (sinter_with f xs ys)) = set (map fst xs) ∩ set (map fst ys)"
by(induct f xs ys rule: sinter_with.induct)(auto simp add: sorted_Cons simp del: set_map)
lemma set_fst_sinter_with_subset1:
"set (map fst (sinter_with f xs ys)) ⊆ set (map fst xs)"
by(induct f xs ys rule: sinter_with.induct) auto
lemma set_fst_sinter_with_subset2:
"set (map fst (sinter_with f xs ys)) ⊆ set (map fst ys)"
by(induct f xs ys rule: sinter_with.induct)(auto simp del: set_map)
lemma sorted_sinter_with [simp]:
"[| sorted (map fst xs); sorted (map fst ys) |]
==> sorted (map fst (sinter_with f xs ys))"
by(induct f xs ys rule: sinter_with.induct)(auto simp add: sorted_Cons simp del: set_map)
lemma distinct_sinter_with [simp]:
"[| distinct (map fst xs); distinct (map fst ys) |]
==> distinct (map fst (sinter_with f xs ys))"
proof(induct f xs ys rule: sinter_with.induct)
case (1 f k v as k' v' bs)
have "[| ¬ k < k'; ¬ k' < k |] ==> k = k'" by simp
thus ?case using "1" set_fst_sinter_with_subset1[of f as bs]
set_fst_sinter_with_subset2[of f as bs]
by(auto simp del: set_map)
qed simp_all
lemma map_of_sinter_with:
"[| sorted (map fst xs); sorted (map fst ys) |]
==> map_of (sinter_with f xs ys) k =
(case map_of xs k of None => None | Some v => Option.map (f k v) (map_of ys k))"
apply(induct f xs ys rule: sinter_with.induct)
apply(auto simp add: sorted_Cons Option.map_def split: option.splits dest: map_of_SomeD bspec)
done
end
lemma distinct_map_of_rev: "distinct (map fst xs) ==> map_of (rev xs) = map_of xs"
by(induct xs)(auto 4 3 simp add: map_add_def intro!: ext split: option.split intro: rev_image_eqI)
lemma map_map_filter:
"map f (List.map_filter g xs) = List.map_filter (Option.map f o g) xs"
by(auto simp add: List.map_filter_def)
lemma map_filter_option_map_const:
"List.map_filter (λx. Option.map (λy. f x) (g (f x))) xs = filter (λx. g x ≠ None) (map f xs)"
by(auto simp add: map_filter_def filter_map o_def)
lemma set_map_filter: "set (List.map_filter P xs) = the ` (P ` set xs - {None})"
by(auto simp add: List.map_filter_def intro: rev_image_eqI)
context ord begin
definition rbt_union_with_key :: "('a => 'b => 'b => 'b) => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt"
where
"rbt_union_with_key f t1 t2 =
(case RBT_Impl.compare_height t1 t1 t2 t2
of compare.EQ => rbtreeify (sunion_with f (entries t1) (entries t2))
| compare.LT => fold (rbt_insert_with_key (λk v w. f k w v)) t1 t2
| compare.GT => fold (rbt_insert_with_key f) t2 t1)"
definition rbt_union_with where
"rbt_union_with f = rbt_union_with_key (λ_. f)"
definition rbt_union where
"rbt_union = rbt_union_with_key (%_ _ rv. rv)"
definition rbt_inter_with_key :: "('a => 'b => 'b => 'b) => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a, 'b) rbt"
where
"rbt_inter_with_key f t1 t2 =
(case RBT_Impl.compare_height t1 t1 t2 t2
of compare.EQ => rbtreeify (sinter_with f (entries t1) (entries t2))
| compare.LT => rbtreeify (List.map_filter (λ(k, v). Option.map (λw. (k, f k v w)) (rbt_lookup t2 k)) (entries t1))
| compare.GT => rbtreeify (List.map_filter (λ(k, v). Option.map (λw. (k, f k w v)) (rbt_lookup t1 k)) (entries t2)))"
definition rbt_inter_with where
"rbt_inter_with f = rbt_inter_with_key (λ_. f)"
definition rbt_inter where
"rbt_inter = rbt_inter_with_key (λ_ _ rv. rv)"
end
context linorder begin
lemma rbt_sorted_entries_right_unique:
"[| (k, v) ∈ set (entries t); (k, v') ∈ set (entries t);
rbt_sorted t |] ==> v = v'"
by(auto dest!: distinct_entries inj_onD[where x="(k, v)" and y="(k, v')"] simp add: distinct_map)
lemma rbt_sorted_fold_rbt_insertwk:
"rbt_sorted t ==> rbt_sorted (List.fold (λ(k, v). rbt_insert_with_key f k v) xs t)"
by(induct xs rule: rev_induct)(auto simp add: rbt_insertwk_rbt_sorted)
lemma is_rbt_fold_rbt_insertwk:
assumes "is_rbt t1"
shows "is_rbt (fold (rbt_insert_with_key f) t2 t1)"
proof -
def xs ≡ "entries t2"
from assms show ?thesis unfolding fold_def xs_def[symmetric]
by(induct xs rule: rev_induct)(auto simp add: rbt_insertwk_is_rbt)
qed
lemma rbt_lookup_fold_rbt_insertwk:
assumes t1: "rbt_sorted t1" and t2: "rbt_sorted t2"
shows "rbt_lookup (fold (rbt_insert_with_key f) t1 t2) k =
(case rbt_lookup t1 k of None => rbt_lookup t2 k
| Some v => case rbt_lookup t2 k of None => Some v
| Some w => Some (f k w v))"
proof -
def xs ≡ "entries t1"
hence dt1: "distinct (map fst xs)" using t1 by(simp add: distinct_entries)
with t2 show ?thesis
unfolding fold_def map_of_entries[OF t1, symmetric]
xs_def[symmetric] distinct_map_of_rev[OF dt1, symmetric]
apply(induct xs rule: rev_induct)
apply(auto simp add: rbt_lookup_rbt_insertwk rbt_sorted_fold_rbt_insertwk split: option.splits)
apply(auto simp add: distinct_map_of_rev intro: rev_image_eqI)
done
qed
lemma is_rbt_rbt_unionwk [simp]:
"[| is_rbt t1; is_rbt t2 |] ==> is_rbt (rbt_union_with_key f t1 t2)"
by(simp add: rbt_union_with_key_def Let_def is_rbt_fold_rbt_insertwk is_rbt_rbtreeify rbt_sorted_entries distinct_entries split: compare.split)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_unionwk:
"[| rbt_sorted t1; rbt_sorted t2 |]
==> rbt_lookup (rbt_union_with_key f t1 t2) k =
(case rbt_lookup t1 k of None => rbt_lookup t2 k
| Some v => case rbt_lookup t2 k of None => Some v
| Some w => Some (f k v w))"
by(auto simp add: rbt_union_with_key_def Let_def rbt_lookup_fold_rbt_insertwk rbt_sorted_entries distinct_entries map_of_sunion_with map_of_entries rbt_lookup_rbtreeify split: option.split compare.split)
lemma rbt_unionw_is_rbt: "[| is_rbt lt; is_rbt rt |] ==> is_rbt (rbt_union_with f lt rt)"
by(simp add: rbt_union_with_def)
lemma rbt_union_is_rbt: "[| is_rbt lt; is_rbt rt |] ==> is_rbt (rbt_union lt rt)"
by(simp add: rbt_union_def)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_union:
"[| rbt_sorted s; rbt_sorted t |] ==>
rbt_lookup (rbt_union s t) = rbt_lookup s ++ rbt_lookup t"
by(rule ext)(simp add: rbt_lookup_rbt_unionwk rbt_union_def map_add_def split: option.split)
lemma rbt_interwk_is_rbt [simp]:
"[| rbt_sorted t1; rbt_sorted t2 |] ==> is_rbt (rbt_inter_with_key f t1 t2)"
by(auto simp add: rbt_inter_with_key_def Let_def map_map_filter split_def o_def option_map_comp map_filter_option_map_const sorted_filter[where f=id, simplified] rbt_sorted_entries distinct_entries intro: is_rbt_rbtreeify split: compare.split)
lemma rbt_interw_is_rbt:
"[| rbt_sorted t1; rbt_sorted t2 |] ==> is_rbt (rbt_inter_with f t1 t2)"
by(simp add: rbt_inter_with_def)
lemma rbt_inter_is_rbt:
"[| rbt_sorted t1; rbt_sorted t2 |] ==> is_rbt (rbt_inter t1 t2)"
by(simp add: rbt_inter_def)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_interwk:
"[| rbt_sorted t1; rbt_sorted t2 |]
==> rbt_lookup (rbt_inter_with_key f t1 t2) k =
(case rbt_lookup t1 k of None => None
| Some v => case rbt_lookup t2 k of None => None
| Some w => Some (f k v w))"
by(auto 4 3 simp add: rbt_inter_with_key_def Let_def map_of_entries[symmetric] rbt_lookup_rbtreeify map_map_filter split_def o_def option_map_comp map_filter_option_map_const sorted_filter[where f=id, simplified] rbt_sorted_entries distinct_entries map_of_sinter_with map_of_eq_None_iff set_map_filter split: option.split compare.split intro: rev_image_eqI dest: rbt_sorted_entries_right_unique)
lemma rbt_lookup_rbt_inter:
"[| rbt_sorted t1; rbt_sorted t2 |]
==> rbt_lookup (rbt_inter t1 t2) = rbt_lookup t2 |` dom (rbt_lookup t1)"
by(auto simp add: rbt_inter_def rbt_lookup_rbt_interwk restrict_map_def split: option.split)
end
subsection {* Code generator setup *}
lemmas [code] =
ord.rbt_less_prop
ord.rbt_greater_prop
ord.rbt_sorted.simps
ord.rbt_lookup.simps
ord.is_rbt_def
ord.rbt_ins.simps
ord.rbt_insert_with_key_def
ord.rbt_insertw_def
ord.rbt_insert_def
ord.rbt_del_from_left.simps
ord.rbt_del_from_right.simps
ord.rbt_del.simps
ord.rbt_delete_def
ord.sunion_with.simps
ord.sinter_with.simps
ord.rbt_union_with_key_def
ord.rbt_union_with_def
ord.rbt_union_def
ord.rbt_inter_with_key_def
ord.rbt_inter_with_def
ord.rbt_inter_def
ord.rbt_map_entry.simps
ord.rbt_bulkload_def
text {* More efficient implementations for @{term entries} and @{term keys} *}
definition gen_entries ::
"(('a × 'b) × ('a, 'b) rbt) list => ('a, 'b) rbt => ('a × 'b) list"
where
"gen_entries kvts t = entries t @ concat (map (λ(kv, t). kv # entries t) kvts)"
lemma gen_entries_simps [simp, code]:
"gen_entries [] Empty = []"
"gen_entries ((kv, t) # kvts) Empty = kv # gen_entries kvts t"
"gen_entries kvts (Branch c l k v r) = gen_entries (((k, v), r) # kvts) l"
by(simp_all add: gen_entries_def)
lemma entries_code [code]:
"entries = gen_entries []"
by(simp add: gen_entries_def fun_eq_iff)
definition gen_keys :: "('a × ('a, 'b) rbt) list => ('a, 'b) rbt => 'a list"
where "gen_keys kts t = RBT_Impl.keys t @ concat (List.map (λ(k, t). k # keys t) kts)"
lemma gen_keys_simps [simp, code]:
"gen_keys [] Empty = []"
"gen_keys ((k, t) # kts) Empty = k # gen_keys kts t"
"gen_keys kts (Branch c l k v r) = gen_keys ((k, r) # kts) l"
by(simp_all add: gen_keys_def)
lemma keys_code [code]:
"keys = gen_keys []"
by(simp add: gen_keys_def fun_eq_iff)
text {* Restore original type constraints for constants *}
setup {*
fold Sign.add_const_constraint
[(@{const_name rbt_less}, SOME @{typ "('a :: order) => ('a, 'b) rbt => bool"}),
(@{const_name rbt_greater}, SOME @{typ "('a :: order) => ('a, 'b) rbt => bool"}),
(@{const_name rbt_sorted}, SOME @{typ "('a :: linorder, 'b) rbt => bool"}),
(@{const_name rbt_lookup}, SOME @{typ "('a :: linorder, 'b) rbt => 'a \<rightharpoonup> 'b"}),
(@{const_name is_rbt}, SOME @{typ "('a :: linorder, 'b) rbt => bool"}),
(@{const_name rbt_ins}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder => 'b => 'b => 'b) => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_insert_with_key}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder => 'b => 'b => 'b) => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_insert_with}, SOME @{typ "('b => 'b => 'b) => ('a :: linorder) => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_insert}, SOME @{typ "('a :: linorder) => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_del_from_left}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder) => ('a,'b) rbt => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_del_from_right}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder) => ('a,'b) rbt => 'a => 'b => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_del}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder) => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_delete}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder) => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_union_with_key}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder => 'b => 'b => 'b) => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_union_with}, SOME @{typ "('b => 'b => 'b) => ('a::linorder,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_union}, SOME @{typ "('a::linorder,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_map_entry}, SOME @{typ "'a::linorder => ('b => 'b) => ('a,'b) rbt => ('a,'b) rbt"}),
(@{const_name rbt_bulkload}, SOME @{typ "('a × 'b) list => ('a::linorder,'b) rbt"})]
*}
hide_const (open) R B Empty entries keys fold gen_keys gen_entries
end